Abnormality Detection in PET Imaging Using Foundation Models: A Comparative Study and Analysis

The escalating clinical demand for positron emission tomography (PET) is accompanied by a heterogeneity in scanners, tracers and acquisition protocols, making PET data complex to interpret, especially when the lesions of interest are subtle or minute. Motivated by this challenge, we investigate abnormality detection on PET scans through the lens of large-scale foundation models and other pre-trained vision encoders, whose broad applicability has recently energised deep-learning research. We present the first systematic 2-D study that contrasts such pretrained backbones with traditional, task-specific architectures in both binary classification and semantic segmentation. For classification, embeddings were extracted from frozen encoders (DINOv2, RAD-DINO, ConvNeXt, etc.) and fed to a lightweight fully-connected head, while a traditional CNN provided the baseline. For segmentation, frozen pretrained encoders-both off-the-shelf and custom-built-are grafted onto the nud-Net pipeline, exploring information fusion at the bottleneck and across multiple feature levels. Experiments demonstrate that DINOv2-based embeddings achieve the most promising results in classification, surpassing the CNN baseline across all metrics while requiring only lightweight training once embeddings are harvested. For segmentation, plain nnU-Net remains superior, indicating that PET-specific fine-tuning of general-purpose encoders may be necessary. These findings chart the promise and current limits of foundation models for clinical PET analysis.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/euvip66349.2025.11238593
Primary Topic
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abnormality Detection in PET Imaging Using Foundation Models: A Comparative Study and Analysis

Aleksandra Pižurica, Ide Van den Borre, Maarten Larmuseau, Simon De Keyser et al.
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
article

Abnormality Detection in PET Imaging Using Foundation Models: A Comparative Study and Analysis

Aleksandra Pižurica, Ide Van den Borre, Maarten Larmuseau, Simon De Keyser, Nathan Vandekerckhove
article en

Abstract

The escalating clinical demand for positron emission tomography (PET) is accompanied by a heterogeneity in scanners, tracers and acquisition protocols, making PET data complex to interpret, especially when the lesions of interest are subtle or minute. Motivated by this challenge, we investigate abnormality detection on PET scans through the lens of large-scale foundation models and other pre-trained vision encoders, whose broad applicability has recently energised deep-learning research. We present the first systematic 2-D study that contrasts such pretrained backbones with traditional, task-specific architectures in both binary classification and semantic segmentation. For classification, embeddings were extracted from frozen encoders (DINOv2, RAD-DINO, ConvNeXt, etc.) and fed to a lightweight fully-connected head, while a traditional CNN provided the baseline. For segmentation, frozen pretrained encoders-both off-the-shelf and custom-built-are grafted onto the nud-Net pipeline, exploring information fusion at the bottleneck and across multiple feature levels. Experiments demonstrate that DINOv2-based embeddings achieve the most promising results in classification, surpassing the CNN baseline across all metrics while requiring only lightweight training once embeddings are harvested. For segmentation, plain nnU-Net remains superior, indicating that PET-specific fine-tuning of general-purpose encoders may be necessary. These findings chart the promise and current limits of foundation models for clinical PET analysis.

Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.