From Risk to Resilience: Willingness-to-Pay for Crop Insurance Among Paddy Farmers in the Kurunegala District, Sri Lanka

Agriculture is one of the many sectors facing significant risks from climate change. To manage potential crop losses, whether climate-related or not, farmers widely rely on crop insurance to increase their resilience. However, farmers in Sri Lanka demonstrate a limited acceptance of crop insurance schemes. This study aimed to investigate the perceptions and Willingness-to-Pay (WTP) for crop insurance schemes among the paddy farmers in Kurunegala district. A total of 248 paddy farmers from the Kurunegala district were recruited as the study sample using the stratified random sampling approach. A pre-tested structured questionnaire and choice cards were used for primary data collection. The Conditional Logit Model (CLM) was used for data analysis. Around 77.8% of respondents were males engaged only in paddy farming, while the majority (62.5%) received an income of LKR 50,000 to 75,000. Complications experienced during the claim form-filling process (mean = 4.6), gaps in covering all crops on the crop land (mean = 4.6), and poor service quality (mean = 4.5) were perceived as the major limitations in existing crop insurance schemes. Outcomes of the CLM indicated that farmers with a positive attitude toward crop insurance significantly prefer plans with drought coverage (β = 0.823; p < 0.05), on-field assessments (β = 0.251; p < 0.05), and higher no-hazard returns (β = 0.318; p < 0.05) while showing a notable sensitivity to premium costs (β = −0.590; p < 0.05). The model also revealed an apparent willingness to switch from the status quo when presented with better-designed alternatives. The findings emphasized the need to implement responsive crop insurance schemes to enhance climate resilience and ensure the sustainability of paddy production in Sri Lanka.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su172210389
Primary Topic
Agricultural risk and resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Risk to Resilience: Willingness-to-Pay for Crop Insurance Among Paddy Farmers in the Kurunegala District, Sri Lanka

Lahiru Udayanga, Bader Alhafi Alotaibi, Nirma Subashini, Savinda Arambawatta Lekamge et al.
Sustainability
Agricultural risk and resilience
article

From Risk to Resilience: Willingness-to-Pay for Crop Insurance Among Paddy Farmers in the Kurunegala District, Sri Lanka

Lahiru Udayanga, Bader Alhafi Alotaibi, Nirma Subashini, Savinda Arambawatta Lekamge, Mohamed Najim, I. V. Kuruppu, H. M. R. K. Ekanayake, Navoda Erabadupitiya
article en

Abstract

Agriculture is one of the many sectors facing significant risks from climate change. To manage potential crop losses, whether climate-related or not, farmers widely rely on crop insurance to increase their resilience. However, farmers in Sri Lanka demonstrate a limited acceptance of crop insurance schemes. This study aimed to investigate the perceptions and Willingness-to-Pay (WTP) for crop insurance schemes among the paddy farmers in Kurunegala district. A total of 248 paddy farmers from the Kurunegala district were recruited as the study sample using the stratified random sampling approach. A pre-tested structured questionnaire and choice cards were used for primary data collection. The Conditional Logit Model (CLM) was used for data analysis. Around 77.8% of respondents were males engaged only in paddy farming, while the majority (62.5%) received an income of LKR 50,000 to 75,000. Complications experienced during the claim form-filling process (mean = 4.6), gaps in covering all crops on the crop land (mean = 4.6), and poor service quality (mean = 4.5) were perceived as the major limitations in existing crop insurance schemes. Outcomes of the CLM indicated that farmers with a positive attitude toward crop insurance significantly prefer plans with drought coverage (β = 0.823; p < 0.05), on-field assessments (β = 0.251; p < 0.05), and higher no-hazard returns (β = 0.318; p < 0.05) while showing a notable sensitivity to premium costs (β = −0.590; p < 0.05). The model also revealed an apparent willingness to switch from the status quo when presented with better-designed alternatives. The findings emphasized the need to implement responsive crop insurance schemes to enhance climate resilience and ensure the sustainability of paddy production in Sri Lanka.

SustainabilityVol. 17(22)
Queensland University of Technology (AU), Wayamba University of Sri Lanka (LK), King Saud University (SA), Sultan Sharif Ali Islamic University (BN)
King Saud University
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Agricultural risk and resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.