The status quo of the development of decentralized clinical trials

Decentralized clinical trials (DCTs) have emerged as a transformative model in new drug development, offering alternatives to traditional site-based trials through the integration of digital technologies and remote processes. This literature review examines the current landscape of DCTs by academic studies, policy reports, and regulatory guidance from major global regions. The review identifies and discusses the opportunities and challenges of DCTs, including scientific and operational innovation, equity and accessibility, governance and trust, and sustainability and infrastructure. A comparative analysis of regulatory frameworks and guidance issued by different regulatory authorities all around the world reveals both convergences and distinctions in how DCTs are approached, particularly in areas such as digital health technologies or patient-centered models. The U.S. emphasizes efficiency and technological integration; the EU prioritizes equity and patient engagement; while China focuses on rare diseases, reducing regional disparities, and maintains a more cautious regulatory approach. The review concludes by identifying the need for greater international coordination and harmonization to fully realize the potential of DCTs while addressing their inherent risks. Building on observed regional differences, it further examines the challenges associated with harmonization, the implications of fragmented governance across jurisdictions, and the lessons learned from pilot implementations. These insights aim to inform future efforts toward more cohesive and globally aligned DCT frameworks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Medicine
Published
2025-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1664648
Primary Topic
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The status quo of the development of decentralized clinical trials

Jiashi Sun, Xiaoliang Chen, Jian‐Chang He, Mingxuan Zhao et al.
Frontiers in Medicine
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
article

The status quo of the development of decentralized clinical trials

Jiashi Sun, Xiaoliang Chen, Jian‐Chang He, Mingxuan Zhao, Xianglin Zhang, Qiang Lv, Na Lei
article en

Abstract

Decentralized clinical trials (DCTs) have emerged as a transformative model in new drug development, offering alternatives to traditional site-based trials through the integration of digital technologies and remote processes. This literature review examines the current landscape of DCTs by academic studies, policy reports, and regulatory guidance from major global regions. The review identifies and discusses the opportunities and challenges of DCTs, including scientific and operational innovation, equity and accessibility, governance and trust, and sustainability and infrastructure. A comparative analysis of regulatory frameworks and guidance issued by different regulatory authorities all around the world reveals both convergences and distinctions in how DCTs are approached, particularly in areas such as digital health technologies or patient-centered models. The U.S. emphasizes efficiency and technological integration; the EU prioritizes equity and patient engagement; while China focuses on rare diseases, reducing regional disparities, and maintains a more cautious regulatory approach. The review concludes by identifying the need for greater international coordination and harmonization to fully realize the potential of DCTs while addressing their inherent risks. Building on observed regional differences, it further examines the challenges associated with harmonization, the implications of fragmented governance across jurisdictions, and the lessons learned from pilot implementations. These insights aim to inform future efforts toward more cohesive and globally aligned DCT frameworks.

Frontiers in MedicineVol. 12
Shenyang Pharmaceutical University (CN), Kunming University of Science and Technology (CN), National Medical Products Administration (CN), Kunming Medical University (CN), Shandong Institute of Food and Drug Inspection (CN), Yunnan Institute For Drug Abuse (CN), The First Hospital of Kunming (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University (CN), Yunnan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.