Milk yield and composition of dairy sheep grazing teff or sorghum-sudangrass under Mediterranean summer conditions

Summer forage scarcity is a major constraint for Mediterranean dairy sheep farming, where high temperatures and drought reduce pasture yield and quality, leading to strong milk seasonality. Teff (Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter), a C4 annual grass native to Ethiopia, is drought- and heat-tolerant and may represent an alternative to traditional summer forages such as sorghum-sudangrass (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench subsp. sudanense). This study evaluated the effects of grazing teff on milk yield and composition in lactating Sarda ewes compared with sorghum-sudangrass under Mediterranean summer conditions. Thirty-two primiparous ewes in late lactation (150 ± 10 DIM) were assigned to two balanced groups (n = 16) and grazed 4 h/day for six weeks (two adaptation, four experimental) on either teff (GT) or sorghum-sudangrass (GS) pastures, supplemented with ad libitum hay and 0.5 kg/day concentrate. Pasture and milk were sampled weekly for chemical and quality analyses. Teff showed higher dry matter (30.8 vs 22.4%), crude protein (14.8 vs 10.6% DM), and ether extract (2.5 vs 1.9% DM), and lower acid detergent fiber (33.1 vs 37.4% DM) and lignin (4.1 vs 5.6% DM) compared with sorghum-sudangrass (P < 0.01). Ewes grazing teff produced slightly less milk (0.86 ± 0.09 vs 0.93 ± 0.11 kg/day; P < 0.05), with lower fat (6.19 vs 6.68%; P < 0.001) but higher lactose content (5.37 vs 5.28%; P < 0.05). Protein (5.60 vs 5.59%), somatic cell count (<200 × 10³ cells/mL), and coagulation traits were unaffected. Overall, both forages adequately supported lactating ewes during the summer. Teff appears promising for water-limited areas due to its heat and drought tolerance and stable nutritional profile, though its slightly lower voluntary intake may limit milk yield. Further studies addressing palatability and intake behavior are warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Animal Science
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fanim.2025.1710178
Primary Topic
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Milk yield and composition of dairy sheep grazing teff or sorghum-sudangrass under Mediterranean summer conditions

Francesco Napoli, Pier Paolo Danieli, Bruno Ronchi, Raffaello Spina et al.
Frontiers in Animal Science
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
article

Milk yield and composition of dairy sheep grazing teff or sorghum-sudangrass under Mediterranean summer conditions

Francesco Napoli, Pier Paolo Danieli, Bruno Ronchi, Raffaello Spina, Chiara Evangelista, Carlo Boselli, Riccardo Primi, U. Bernabucci, Gloria Bernabucci
article en

Abstract

Summer forage scarcity is a major constraint for Mediterranean dairy sheep farming, where high temperatures and drought reduce pasture yield and quality, leading to strong milk seasonality. Teff (Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter), a C4 annual grass native to Ethiopia, is drought- and heat-tolerant and may represent an alternative to traditional summer forages such as sorghum-sudangrass (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench subsp. sudanense). This study evaluated the effects of grazing teff on milk yield and composition in lactating Sarda ewes compared with sorghum-sudangrass under Mediterranean summer conditions. Thirty-two primiparous ewes in late lactation (150 ± 10 DIM) were assigned to two balanced groups (n = 16) and grazed 4 h/day for six weeks (two adaptation, four experimental) on either teff (GT) or sorghum-sudangrass (GS) pastures, supplemented with ad libitum hay and 0.5 kg/day concentrate. Pasture and milk were sampled weekly for chemical and quality analyses. Teff showed higher dry matter (30.8 vs 22.4%), crude protein (14.8 vs 10.6% DM), and ether extract (2.5 vs 1.9% DM), and lower acid detergent fiber (33.1 vs 37.4% DM) and lignin (4.1 vs 5.6% DM) compared with sorghum-sudangrass (P < 0.01). Ewes grazing teff produced slightly less milk (0.86 ± 0.09 vs 0.93 ± 0.11 kg/day; P < 0.05), with lower fat (6.19 vs 6.68%; P < 0.001) but higher lactose content (5.37 vs 5.28%; P < 0.05). Protein (5.60 vs 5.59%), somatic cell count (<200 × 10³ cells/mL), and coagulation traits were unaffected. Overall, both forages adequately supported lactating ewes during the summer. Teff appears promising for water-limited areas due to its heat and drought tolerance and stable nutritional profile, though its slightly lower voluntary intake may limit milk yield. Further studies addressing palatability and intake behavior are warranted.

Frontiers in Animal ScienceVol. 6
Università degli Studi della Tuscia (IT), Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Regioni Lazio e Toscana (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.