Evidence-Based Practices in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory: Invasive Epicardial Coronary Physiologic Assessment: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Invasive epicardial coronary physiologic assessment is increasingly performed to evaluate the hemodynamic significance of intermediate coronary lesions and is recommended by guideline committees. Whereas much of the practice in coronary physiologic assessment is based on evidence, some non-evidence-based traditions and misconceptions persist. The aim of this review is to highlight evidence-based practice in invasive epicardial coronary physiologic assessment and to refute or validate common elements of clinical practice.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/cir.0000000000001389
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evidence-Based Practices in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory: Invasive Epicardial Coronary Physiologic Assessment: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Setri Fugar, Nils P. Johnson, David Power, George Dangas et al.
1 citations
Circulation
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
2.01
article

Evidence-Based Practices in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory: Invasive Epicardial Coronary Physiologic Assessment: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Setri Fugar, Nils P. Johnson, David Power, George Dangas, Jacqueline Tamis‐Holland, Sripal Bangalore, Morton J. Kern, William F. Fearon, Sohah N. Iqbal
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Invasive epicardial coronary physiologic assessment is increasingly performed to evaluate the hemodynamic significance of intermediate coronary lesions and is recommended by guideline committees. Whereas much of the practice in coronary physiologic assessment is based on evidence, some non-evidence-based traditions and misconceptions persist. The aim of this review is to highlight evidence-based practice in invasive epicardial coronary physiologic assessment and to refute or validate common elements of clinical practice.

CirculationVol. 153(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.