Coda nasals in early Germanic languages

A growing body of research on phonological features claims that they are not universal elements of language. Rather, it argues that they are emergent, meaning that they are encoded based on phonetic cues as well as sociohistorical factors. In emergent feature theory, features are probabilistically encoded. The clearest phonetic cues result in the clearest featural encoding. But phonetic cues can be blurrier for certain segments and in certain contexts. In these situations, multiple feature encodings are possible. Little research has explored the range of emergent specifications that are possible. This paper argues that coda nasals in early Germanic languages were marked with the feature [low], while onsets were not. Due to the lowness specification of coda nasals, the blocking of Northwest Germanic a-umlaut, Proto-Germanic pre-nasal raising, and high vowel lowering conditioned by coda nasals and post-velar fricatives in Old Norse can be accounted for in a novel and straightforward manner.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-025-09166-0
Primary Topic
Linguistics and language evolution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Coda nasals in early Germanic languages

Andrew Kostakis
The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics
Linguistics and language evolution
article

Coda nasals in early Germanic languages

Andrew Kostakis
article en

Abstract

A growing body of research on phonological features claims that they are not universal elements of language. Rather, it argues that they are emergent, meaning that they are encoded based on phonetic cues as well as sociohistorical factors. In emergent feature theory, features are probabilistically encoded. The clearest phonetic cues result in the clearest featural encoding. But phonetic cues can be blurrier for certain segments and in certain contexts. In these situations, multiple feature encodings are possible. Little research has explored the range of emergent specifications that are possible. This paper argues that coda nasals in early Germanic languages were marked with the feature [low], while onsets were not. Due to the lowness specification of coda nasals, the blocking of Northwest Germanic a-umlaut, Proto-Germanic pre-nasal raising, and high vowel lowering conditioned by coda nasals and post-velar fricatives in Old Norse can be accounted for in a novel and straightforward manner.

The Journal of Comparative Germanic LinguisticsVol. 28(1)
Austin Peay State University (US)
Universität Leipzig
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Linguistics and language evolution
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.