Clinical assessment and acceptance criteria for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system performance: A proposed guideline by the IFCC Working Group on CGM

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems are essential tools for modern diabetes care. However, the assessment of their analytical performance has been hindered by a lack of standardization. This poses challenges for the field, as the choice of study procedures and evaluation methods can influence the observed performance, further complicating the comparisons between CGM systems and confounding the interpretation and use of CGM metrics as research outcomes. To address this issue, the Working Group on CGM of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) has developed a comprehensive guideline for the clinical assessment of CGM systems. The guideline defines requirements for study design and procedures, characteristics of comparator measurements, minimum requirements for accuracy, and performance characterization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinica Chimica Acta
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2025.120728
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Diabetes Management and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.77
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical assessment and acceptance criteria for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system performance: A proposed guideline by the IFCC Working Group on CGM

L. Witthauer, Manuel Eichenlaub, James H. Nichols, Konstantinos Makris et al.
6 citations
Clinica Chimica Acta
Diabetes Management and Research
7.77
article

Clinical assessment and acceptance criteria for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system performance: A proposed guideline by the IFCC Working Group on CGM

L. Witthauer, Manuel Eichenlaub, James H. Nichols, Konstantinos Makris, Elizabeth Selvin, Stefan Pleus, Marion Fokkert, Viswanathan Mohan, Peter Diem, Rolf Hinzmann, Jingyi Lu, Robbert J. Slingerland, Elisabet Eriksson Boija, JOHAN H. JENDLE, John Pemberton, Pradeep Kumar Dabla, Nam K. Tran, Guido Freckmann, Andreas Thomas, David Charles Klonoff
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems are essential tools for modern diabetes care. However, the assessment of their analytical performance has been hindered by a lack of standardization. This poses challenges for the field, as the choice of study procedures and evaluation methods can influence the observed performance, further complicating the comparisons between CGM systems and confounding the interpretation and use of CGM metrics as research outcomes. To address this issue, the Working Group on CGM of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) has developed a comprehensive guideline for the clinical assessment of CGM systems. The guideline defines requirements for study design and procedures, characteristics of comparator measurements, minimum requirements for accuracy, and performance characterization.

Clinica Chimica ActaVol. 580
Uppsala Monitoring Centre (SE), Johns Hopkins University (US), Universität Ulm (DE), Örebro University (SE), University Hospital of Bern (CH), Kantonsarchäologie (CH), Mills Peninsula Health Services (US), Scientific Consulting Group (US), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US), Dr. Mohan's Diabetes Specialities Centre (IN), Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital (CN), Isala (NL), KAT General Hospital of Attica (GR), Birmingham Women’s and Children’s NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Govind Ballabh Pant Hospital (IN), Oldham Council (GB), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Diabetes Management and Research
7.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.