(P1) effectiveness of low-intensity shockwave therapy for erectile dysfunction: a systematic review of studies from the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region

Abstract Introduction Low-intensity shockwave therapy (LiSWT) has emerged as a novel, non-invasive treatment modality for erectile dysfunction (ED), believed to promote angiogenesis and improve erectile function through tissue regeneration. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of LiSWT in the management of ED by analyzing outcomes from various clinical studies originating from the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. Methods A systematic review was performed using PubMed as the primary search engine. Studies were included if they evaluated the effects of LiSWT on patients with ED, had a prospective design, reported outcomes such as the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), Erection Hardness Scale (EHS), and other relevant measures, and originated from countries within the MENA region. The review followed the (PRISMA) guidelines for systematic reviews and included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomized comparative, and observational studies. A total of 10 studies were included in the review, comprising 5 RCTs, 2 non-randomized comparative trials, and 3 observational studies. Sample sizes ranged from 40 to 425 patients, and treatment protocols varied from 4 to 12 sessions. Two RCTs comparing LiSWT to sham treatments reported significant increases in IIEF-5 scores up to 3 months post-intervention, although one study found no significant differences at 6 months. Other RCTs comparing LiSWT to PDE-5 inhibitors or control groups showed significant improvements in all groups, with no significant differences between groups. The combination of LiSWT and a physical exercise regimen outperformed monotherapy with either LiSWT or exercise alone. All observational studies demonstrated improvements in erectile function, with rates of satisfactory sexual intercourse ranging from 51.8% to 76.3% during follow-up periods of up to 30 months. LiSWT was generally well-tolerated across studies, with minimal reported side effects. Conclusion Within the MENA region, LiSWT appears to be an effective and well-tolerated treatment for ED, with reported outcomes that seem to be similar to those observed with PDE-5i treatment. However, additional large-scale RCTs are needed to standardize treatment protocols and assess long-term efficacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Sexual Medicine
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/qdaf311.001
Primary Topic
Sexual function and dysfunction studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

(P1) effectiveness of low-intensity shockwave therapy for erectile dysfunction: a systematic review of studies from the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region

Mohamed Arafa, Osama Shaeer, Ahmed Loghmari, Mohamed Wael Ragab et al.
The Journal of Sexual Medicine
Sexual function and dysfunction studies
article

(P1) effectiveness of low-intensity shockwave therapy for erectile dysfunction: a systematic review of studies from the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region

Mohamed Arafa, Osama Shaeer, Ahmed Loghmari, Mohamed Wael Ragab, Amr Abdelhamed, Ahmad Majzoub, Haitham Elbardisi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Low-intensity shockwave therapy (LiSWT) has emerged as a novel, non-invasive treatment modality for erectile dysfunction (ED), believed to promote angiogenesis and improve erectile function through tissue regeneration. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of LiSWT in the management of ED by analyzing outcomes from various clinical studies originating from the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. Methods A systematic review was performed using PubMed as the primary search engine. Studies were included if they evaluated the effects of LiSWT on patients with ED, had a prospective design, reported outcomes such as the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), Erection Hardness Scale (EHS), and other relevant measures, and originated from countries within the MENA region. The review followed the (PRISMA) guidelines for systematic reviews and included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomized comparative, and observational studies. A total of 10 studies were included in the review, comprising 5 RCTs, 2 non-randomized comparative trials, and 3 observational studies. Sample sizes ranged from 40 to 425 patients, and treatment protocols varied from 4 to 12 sessions. Two RCTs comparing LiSWT to sham treatments reported significant increases in IIEF-5 scores up to 3 months post-intervention, although one study found no significant differences at 6 months. Other RCTs comparing LiSWT to PDE-5 inhibitors or control groups showed significant improvements in all groups, with no significant differences between groups. The combination of LiSWT and a physical exercise regimen outperformed monotherapy with either LiSWT or exercise alone. All observational studies demonstrated improvements in erectile function, with rates of satisfactory sexual intercourse ranging from 51.8% to 76.3% during follow-up periods of up to 30 months. LiSWT was generally well-tolerated across studies, with minimal reported side effects. Conclusion Within the MENA region, LiSWT appears to be an effective and well-tolerated treatment for ED, with reported outcomes that seem to be similar to those observed with PDE-5i treatment. However, additional large-scale RCTs are needed to standardize treatment protocols and assess long-term efficacy.

The Journal of Sexual MedicineVol. 22(Supplement_3)
Cairo University (EG), Hôpital Sahloul (TN), Weill Cornell Medical College in Qatar (QA), Hamad Medical Corporation (QA), Qatar University (QA), University of Sousse (TN), Sohag University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Sexual function and dysfunction studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.