(P21) influence of industry payments on prescription behavior pattern of testosterone medications among physicians in the United States: national claim database analysis

Abstract Background To determine the impact of physicians’ financial relationships with the pharmaceutical industry on prescribing marketed Testosterone medications ie, prescription behavior pattern. To determine the impact of physicians’ financial relationships with the pharmaceutical industry on prescribing marketed Testosterone medications ie, prescription behavior pattern. Methods We identified prescribers from the 2021 Medicare Part D Prescribers – by Provider and Drug dataset and the CMS General Open Payment Data Prescriber public use file. This file contains prescriber identifying information (name and practice address) and claim counts for all pharmaceuticals prescribed to beneficiaries with Medicare Part D coverage. We sorted the prescribers based on three categories, (All Providers, “Urologists”, and “Non-Urologists”). We included all prescription drugs labeled “testosterone”. We recorded the total number of prescriptions of “testosterone” drugs for each prescribing provider. We recorded the total number of financial payments each prescriber received for the generic-named “testosterone” drugs. Both the number of payments and the total value of payments were included. Results We identified 387 452 prescribers (273 978 urologists and 113 474 non-urologists) with linked data in the Open Payment Data and Medicare Part D databases. In 2021, 2774 out of 4565 (60.77%) providers who received a payment prescribed testosterone drugs; 15 729 out of 382 887 (4.11%) providers who did not receive a payment prescribed testosterone drugs (p < 0.001). In 2021, 1653 out of 2654 (62.28%) “urologists” who received a payment prescribed testosterone drugs; 6752 out of 271 324 (2.49%) “urologists” who did not receive a payment prescribed testosterone drugs (p < 0.001). In 2021, 1121 out of 1911 (58.66%) “non-urologists” who did receive a payment prescribed testosterone drugs; 8977 out of 111 563 (8.05%) “non-urologists” who did not receive a payment prescribed testosterone drugs (p < 0.001) (Table 1). Conclusion There is a consistent association between receipt of industry payment and prescribing marketed Testosterone medications particularly among urologists providers. This claim database analysis does indicate that prescription behavior pattern for testosterone medications is primarily influenced by industry payments particularly among urologists providers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Sexual Medicine
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/qdaf311.020
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

(P21) influence of industry payments on prescription behavior pattern of testosterone medications among physicians in the United States: national claim database analysis

Petar Bajic, Zaamin B. Hussain, Omer Raheem, Parth K. Modi et al.
The Journal of Sexual Medicine
Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
article

(P21) influence of industry payments on prescription behavior pattern of testosterone medications among physicians in the United States: national claim database analysis

Petar Bajic, Zaamin B. Hussain, Omer Raheem, Parth K. Modi, Nikit Venishetty, S Kalidoss, Hui Zhang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background To determine the impact of physicians’ financial relationships with the pharmaceutical industry on prescribing marketed Testosterone medications ie, prescription behavior pattern. To determine the impact of physicians’ financial relationships with the pharmaceutical industry on prescribing marketed Testosterone medications ie, prescription behavior pattern. Methods We identified prescribers from the 2021 Medicare Part D Prescribers – by Provider and Drug dataset and the CMS General Open Payment Data Prescriber public use file. This file contains prescriber identifying information (name and practice address) and claim counts for all pharmaceuticals prescribed to beneficiaries with Medicare Part D coverage. We sorted the prescribers based on three categories, (All Providers, “Urologists”, and “Non-Urologists”). We included all prescription drugs labeled “testosterone”. We recorded the total number of prescriptions of “testosterone” drugs for each prescribing provider. We recorded the total number of financial payments each prescriber received for the generic-named “testosterone” drugs. Both the number of payments and the total value of payments were included. Results We identified 387 452 prescribers (273 978 urologists and 113 474 non-urologists) with linked data in the Open Payment Data and Medicare Part D databases. In 2021, 2774 out of 4565 (60.77%) providers who received a payment prescribed testosterone drugs; 15 729 out of 382 887 (4.11%) providers who did not receive a payment prescribed testosterone drugs (p < 0.001). In 2021, 1653 out of 2654 (62.28%) “urologists” who received a payment prescribed testosterone drugs; 6752 out of 271 324 (2.49%) “urologists” who did not receive a payment prescribed testosterone drugs (p < 0.001). In 2021, 1121 out of 1911 (58.66%) “non-urologists” who did receive a payment prescribed testosterone drugs; 8977 out of 111 563 (8.05%) “non-urologists” who did not receive a payment prescribed testosterone drugs (p < 0.001) (Table 1). Conclusion There is a consistent association between receipt of industry payment and prescribing marketed Testosterone medications particularly among urologists providers. This claim database analysis does indicate that prescription behavior pattern for testosterone medications is primarily influenced by industry payments particularly among urologists providers.

The Journal of Sexual MedicineVol. 22(Supplement_3)
Cleveland Clinic (US), The University of Texas at El Paso (US), University of Chicago (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.