Energy aid, environmental risk, and household health effects

This study examines the health impacts of energy aid, a topic that has received limited attention compared to its environmental and energy-related effects. Using an unbalanced panel dataset, we identify an inverted U-shaped relationship between energy aid and household health loss, with benefits emerging only after aid exceeds a turning point. The effects differ by aid type, source, and recipient characteristics. Among all categories, only energy policy aid has an inverted U-shaped effect on household health losses. Aid from non-DAC donors (including non-DAC countries, private donors, and multilateral organizations) follows an inverted U-shaped pattern, while aid from DAC countries shows no clear relationship. Furthermore, the impact of energy aid also varies across demographic groups, including age, gender, and income levels. For example, children experience health benefits earlier than adults. We also find a threshold effect of government quality. Only when government quality exceeds the threshold does energy aid reduce health loss. These findings suggest that improving the continuity and equity of aid and strengthening governance in recipient countries are key to enhancing the health impact of energy aid. • Energy aid has an inverted U-shaped effect on household health losses. • Health benefits emerge only when energy aid exceeds a certain level. • The impact of energy aid differs by type, source, and recipient group. • Children and residents in vulnerable countries benefit earlier from energy aid. • Only strong recipient governance enables energy aid to reduce health losses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economic Modelling
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2025.107388
Primary Topic
Energy and Environment Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Energy aid, environmental risk, and household health effects

Congyu Zhao, Tooraj Jamasb, Kangyin Dong, Yang Liu et al.
Economic Modelling
Energy and Environment Impacts
article

Energy aid, environmental risk, and household health effects

Congyu Zhao, Tooraj Jamasb, Kangyin Dong, Yang Liu, Rabindra Nepal
article en

Abstract

This study examines the health impacts of energy aid, a topic that has received limited attention compared to its environmental and energy-related effects. Using an unbalanced panel dataset, we identify an inverted U-shaped relationship between energy aid and household health loss, with benefits emerging only after aid exceeds a turning point. The effects differ by aid type, source, and recipient characteristics. Among all categories, only energy policy aid has an inverted U-shaped effect on household health losses. Aid from non-DAC donors (including non-DAC countries, private donors, and multilateral organizations) follows an inverted U-shaped pattern, while aid from DAC countries shows no clear relationship. Furthermore, the impact of energy aid also varies across demographic groups, including age, gender, and income levels. For example, children experience health benefits earlier than adults. We also find a threshold effect of government quality. Only when government quality exceeds the threshold does energy aid reduce health loss. These findings suggest that improving the continuity and equity of aid and strengthening governance in recipient countries are key to enhancing the health impact of energy aid. • Energy aid has an inverted U-shaped effect on household health losses. • Health benefits emerge only when energy aid exceeds a certain level. • The impact of energy aid differs by type, source, and recipient group. • Children and residents in vulnerable countries benefit earlier from energy aid. • Only strong recipient governance enables energy aid to reduce health losses.

Economic ModellingVol. 155
University of International Business and Economics (CN), Copenhagen Business School (DK), University of Wollongong (AU), Vinci (France) (FR)
University of International Business and Economics, National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Energy and Environment Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.