Assessing the role of Australia’s Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme as a tool for addressing inequality in access to medications and allocation of public funds for pregnant women

The PBS facilitates equitable access to publicly funded medications for pregnant women. However, the uniform distribution of public funds across socioeconomic groups suggests possible limitations in progressivity, as public subsidies are not disproportionately benefiting the most disadvantaged women overall. This may reflect missed opportunities to distribute public funds more effectively and efficiently, particularly if disadvantaged women are under-represented in access to newer, higher cost therapies, and warrants ongoing evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Global Health
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-018565
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the role of Australia’s Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme as a tool for addressing inequality in access to medications and allocation of public funds for pregnant women

Hannah Jackson, Sarah Wise, Joanne Enticott, Emily Joy Callander et al.
BMJ Global Health
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

Assessing the role of Australia’s Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme as a tool for addressing inequality in access to medications and allocation of public funds for pregnant women

Hannah Jackson, Sarah Wise, Joanne Enticott, Emily Joy Callander, Luke E. Grzeskowiak
article en

Abstract

The PBS facilitates equitable access to publicly funded medications for pregnant women. However, the uniform distribution of public funds across socioeconomic groups suggests possible limitations in progressivity, as public subsidies are not disproportionately benefiting the most disadvantaged women overall. This may reflect missed opportunities to distribute public funds more effectively and efficiently, particularly if disadvantaged women are under-represented in access to newer, higher cost therapies, and warrants ongoing evaluation.

BMJ Global HealthVol. 10(11)
University of Technology Sydney (AU), Flinders University (AU), South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (AU), Monash University (AU)
Queensland Health, Australian Government, Channel 7 Children's Research Foundation, University of Technology Sydney, Medical Research Council, National Health and Medical Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.