Using Machine Learning to Predict Psychosomatic Rehabilitation Success

Abstract: This study used data from 7,436 patients across seven psychosomatic rehabilitation clinics to explore predictors of treatment success and to assess the feasibility of predicting rehabilitation outcomes using machine learning. Five outcomes based on the biopsychosocial model – activity, depressive symptoms, participation, phobic fears, and somatoform complaints – were derived from the HEALTH-49 and ICF AT-50 Psych. The outcomes were dichotomized to indicate relevant change from admission (T1) to discharge (T2). Random forests using baseline scores, PAREMO-20, and SIMBO-C items, treatment year, clinic, sex, and age, outperformed all dummy classifiers, yielding accuracies between 63.0% (participation) and 75.9% (phobic fears). Feature importances revealed baseline scores as key predictors. Skepticism toward rehabilitation predicted all outcomes except phobic fears, while willingness to change predicted all outcomes except depressive symptoms. Difficulties in social interaction impacted depressive symptoms and phobic fears. Work-related challenges were key predictors for activity and participation. Age, sex, year, and clinic had no impact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zeitschrift für Psychologie
Published
2025-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000610
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using Machine Learning to Predict Psychosomatic Rehabilitation Success

Mirjam Körner, Anja S. Göritz, Marcel E. K. F. Holzer, Natalie M. Hogh et al.
1 citations
Zeitschrift für Psychologie
Digital Mental Health Interventions
1.54
article

Using Machine Learning to Predict Psychosomatic Rehabilitation Success

Mirjam Körner, Anja S. Göritz, Marcel E. K. F. Holzer, Natalie M. Hogh, Paul-Gerrit Velthuysen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract: This study used data from 7,436 patients across seven psychosomatic rehabilitation clinics to explore predictors of treatment success and to assess the feasibility of predicting rehabilitation outcomes using machine learning. Five outcomes based on the biopsychosocial model – activity, depressive symptoms, participation, phobic fears, and somatoform complaints – were derived from the HEALTH-49 and ICF AT-50 Psych. The outcomes were dichotomized to indicate relevant change from admission (T1) to discharge (T2). Random forests using baseline scores, PAREMO-20, and SIMBO-C items, treatment year, clinic, sex, and age, outperformed all dummy classifiers, yielding accuracies between 63.0% (participation) and 75.9% (phobic fears). Feature importances revealed baseline scores as key predictors. Skepticism toward rehabilitation predicted all outcomes except phobic fears, while willingness to change predicted all outcomes except depressive symptoms. Difficulties in social interaction impacted depressive symptoms and phobic fears. Work-related challenges were key predictors for activity and participation. Age, sex, year, and clinic had no impact.

Zeitschrift für PsychologieVol. 234(1-2)
University of Bern (CH), Bern University of Applied Sciences (CH), University of Hildesheim (DE), University of Augsburg (DE), University Medical Center Freiburg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
1.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Using Machine Learning to Predict Psychosomatic Rehabilitation Success — Mirjam Körner, Anja S. Göritz, et al. · Zeitschrift für Psychologie (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS