Orthogonal representational geometry in dACC underpins human hierarchical reasoning

Flexible cognitive control requires inferring the causes of feedback and adjusting accordingly. When tasks are hierarchically structured with high-level rules governing low-level perceptual judgments, good performance requires hierarchical reasoning. Yet how the human brain represents and integrates multiple task-relevant variables to support the computations required for hierarchical reasoning remains unclear. Here, building on Bayesian modeling and recurrent neural network simulation of hierarchical reasoning, we show that such algorithm and its representations are implemented in the human dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC). Accumulated errors and perceptual difficulty are integrated in dACC to estimate high-level rule switch confidence. These variables are represented along two separable dimensions that can be approximated by basis functions. Orthogonality between them supports a two-dimensional representation well suited for hierarchical reasoning. A closer-to-orthogonal representational geometry also correlates with accurate computation and better performance. Together, these findings provide an integrated computational and neural explanation for hierarchical reasoning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cell Reports
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2026.117929
Primary Topic
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Orthogonal representational geometry in dACC underpins human hierarchical reasoning

Ruizhen Hu, Wenshan Dong, Tom Verguts, Chuanyong Xu et al.
Cell Reports
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
article

Orthogonal representational geometry in dACC underpins human hierarchical reasoning

Ruizhen Hu, Wenshan Dong, Tom Verguts, Chuanyong Xu, Qi Chen, Ning Mei
article en

Abstract

Flexible cognitive control requires inferring the causes of feedback and adjusting accordingly. When tasks are hierarchically structured with high-level rules governing low-level perceptual judgments, good performance requires hierarchical reasoning. Yet how the human brain represents and integrates multiple task-relevant variables to support the computations required for hierarchical reasoning remains unclear. Here, building on Bayesian modeling and recurrent neural network simulation of hierarchical reasoning, we show that such algorithm and its representations are implemented in the human dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC). Accumulated errors and perceptual difficulty are integrated in dACC to estimate high-level rule switch confidence. These variables are represented along two separable dimensions that can be approximated by basis functions. Orthogonality between them supports a two-dimensional representation well suited for hierarchical reasoning. A closer-to-orthogonal representational geometry also correlates with accurate computation and better performance. Together, these findings provide an integrated computational and neural explanation for hierarchical reasoning.

Cell ReportsVol. 45(9)
Shenzhen University (CN), South China Normal University (CN), Ghent University (BE), Shenzhen University Health Science Center (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Orthogonal representational geometry in dACC underpins human hierarchical reasoning — Ruizhen Hu, Wenshan Dong, et al. · Cell Reports (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS