Co-designing fodder diversification and co-products recycling fosters effectiveness, productivity and agroecological transition of dairy farms in Burkina Faso

Introduction Burkina Faso's dairy farms, whether extensive or semi-intensive, face major sustainability challenges. Introducing agroecological technologies offers an opportunity to optimize the use of local resources and enhance farm resilience and productivity. This study presents an innovative approach that tests and assesses, in co-design with farmers, the integration of two major agroecological technologies that underpin crop–livestock integration. Methods To assess the impact of these agroecological technologies, dairy farmers of the Bobo-Dioulasso milkshed implemented on-farm trials involving: (i) the introduction of dual-purpose fodder cereals (maize and sorghum) and legumes (Cowpea and mucuna) for feeding lactating cows, and (ii) the recycling of livestock and crop co-products to produce manure in covered manure pits. We employed a four-step methodological approach for co-designing agroecological innovations with 43 dairy farmers: diagnosis, co-design and experimentation, assessment, and identification of induced changes. Data from experiments and participatory assessment workshops were analyzed to compare dairy farm performance before and after the introduction of agroecological technologies. The first changes induced by these technologies were identified and characterized through participatory workshops. Results and discussion The introduction of dual-purpose fodder crops into production systems led to improvements in on-farm milk production. Legume fodder storage increased from 356 to 518 kg DM/farm (+45%), while cereal fodder storage decreased slightly (1,388 to 1,091 kg DM/farm). The establishment of covered manure pits enhanced manure quality, with an average increase of 4,679 kg DM/farm. Milk production rose markedly, by over 80% for mixed cows (6.43 vs. 11.67 L/d/cow) and 12% for zebu cows (1.11 vs. 1.25 L/d/cow). Agroecological performance scores also improved particularly in diversity (38% vs. 94% after introduction of agroecological technologies), recycling (31% vs. 88%), and synergy (25% vs. 69%). These results demonstrate that a step-by-step integration of agroecological technologies can enhance their effectiveness and milk productivity, while strengthening the resilience of dairy farms, particularly in the face of climatic and economic challenges. Under conditions of prolonged dry seasons, irregular rainfall, and volatile prices of industrial inputs, the combination of these technologies ensures both the availability of fodder for livestock and manure for soil fertilization. Nevertheless, continued efforts are required to maintain and further improve this performance over time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Agronomy
Published
2025-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2025.1657477
Primary Topic
Agriculture and Rural Development Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Co-designing fodder diversification and co-products recycling fosters effectiveness, productivity and agroecological transition of dairy farms in Burkina Faso

Songdah Désiré Ouattara, Éric Vall, Boko Michel Orounladji, Valérie M. C. Bougouma-Yameogo et al.
Frontiers in Agronomy
Agriculture and Rural Development Research
article

Co-designing fodder diversification and co-products recycling fosters effectiveness, productivity and agroecological transition of dairy farms in Burkina Faso

Songdah Désiré Ouattara, Éric Vall, Boko Michel Orounladji, Valérie M. C. Bougouma-Yameogo, Ollo Sib, Souleymane Sanogo
article en

Abstract

Introduction Burkina Faso's dairy farms, whether extensive or semi-intensive, face major sustainability challenges. Introducing agroecological technologies offers an opportunity to optimize the use of local resources and enhance farm resilience and productivity. This study presents an innovative approach that tests and assesses, in co-design with farmers, the integration of two major agroecological technologies that underpin crop–livestock integration. Methods To assess the impact of these agroecological technologies, dairy farmers of the Bobo-Dioulasso milkshed implemented on-farm trials involving: (i) the introduction of dual-purpose fodder cereals (maize and sorghum) and legumes (Cowpea and mucuna) for feeding lactating cows, and (ii) the recycling of livestock and crop co-products to produce manure in covered manure pits. We employed a four-step methodological approach for co-designing agroecological innovations with 43 dairy farmers: diagnosis, co-design and experimentation, assessment, and identification of induced changes. Data from experiments and participatory assessment workshops were analyzed to compare dairy farm performance before and after the introduction of agroecological technologies. The first changes induced by these technologies were identified and characterized through participatory workshops. Results and discussion The introduction of dual-purpose fodder crops into production systems led to improvements in on-farm milk production. Legume fodder storage increased from 356 to 518 kg DM/farm (+45%), while cereal fodder storage decreased slightly (1,388 to 1,091 kg DM/farm). The establishment of covered manure pits enhanced manure quality, with an average increase of 4,679 kg DM/farm. Milk production rose markedly, by over 80% for mixed cows (6.43 vs. 11.67 L/d/cow) and 12% for zebu cows (1.11 vs. 1.25 L/d/cow). Agroecological performance scores also improved particularly in diversity (38% vs. 94% after introduction of agroecological technologies), recycling (31% vs. 88%), and synergy (25% vs. 69%). These results demonstrate that a step-by-step integration of agroecological technologies can enhance their effectiveness and milk productivity, while strengthening the resilience of dairy farms, particularly in the face of climatic and economic challenges. Under conditions of prolonged dry seasons, irregular rainfall, and volatile prices of industrial inputs, the combination of these technologies ensures both the availability of fodder for livestock and manure for soil fertilization. Nevertheless, continued efforts are required to maintain and further improve this performance over time.

Frontiers in AgronomyVol. 7
Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (FR), Université de Montpellier (FR), Nazi Boni University (BF), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Institut Agro Montpelier (FR), Centre international de recherche-développement sur l'elevage en zone subhumide (BF), Systèmes d’élevage méditerranéens et tropicaux (FR)
Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Agriculture and Rural Development Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.