The consequences of shared leadership on job demands and job resources in project teams

Shared leadership has been identified as an important form of team-centric leadership that complements vertical leadership practices in project teams. It has been connected with many positive outcomes on team performance and effectiveness, and it has been reported to enhance team members' job satisfaction. However, less is known about how team members experience the consequences of shared leadership. Hence the aim of our study was to explore how shared leadership consequences are experienced amongst project team members, and how these consequences are related to job demands and resources. We conducted a qualitative study with 31 participants from 15 project teams from private and public sector. The data was analysed with a lens of job demands-resources (JD-R) theory to capture how team members perceive shared leadership consequences, and how these experiences are reflected as job demands and resources. We found that project team members’ experiences of shared leadership consequences were reflected as increasing hindrance and challenge demands, and as enhancing job resources. Our findings bring new knowledge on shared leadership consequences and highlight both the benefits and cautions of these consequences for project teams. • Shared leadership was experienced to increase job demands and resources. • Shared leadership was experienced to enhance project teams' job resources. • Increased hindrance demands can be mitigated by clearly defined goals and roles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Project Leadership and Society
Published
2025-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2025.100203
Primary Topic
Team Dynamics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The consequences of shared leadership on job demands and job resources in project teams

Markku Jokisaari, Marion Karppi, Ursula Hyrkkänen
Project Leadership and Society
Team Dynamics and Performance
article

The consequences of shared leadership on job demands and job resources in project teams

Markku Jokisaari, Marion Karppi, Ursula Hyrkkänen
article en

Abstract

Shared leadership has been identified as an important form of team-centric leadership that complements vertical leadership practices in project teams. It has been connected with many positive outcomes on team performance and effectiveness, and it has been reported to enhance team members' job satisfaction. However, less is known about how team members experience the consequences of shared leadership. Hence the aim of our study was to explore how shared leadership consequences are experienced amongst project team members, and how these consequences are related to job demands and resources. We conducted a qualitative study with 31 participants from 15 project teams from private and public sector. The data was analysed with a lens of job demands-resources (JD-R) theory to capture how team members perceive shared leadership consequences, and how these experiences are reflected as job demands and resources. We found that project team members’ experiences of shared leadership consequences were reflected as increasing hindrance and challenge demands, and as enhancing job resources. Our findings bring new knowledge on shared leadership consequences and highlight both the benefits and cautions of these consequences for project teams. • Shared leadership was experienced to increase job demands and resources. • Shared leadership was experienced to enhance project teams' job resources. • Increased hindrance demands can be mitigated by clearly defined goals and roles.

Project Leadership and SocietyVol. 6
University of Turku (FI), Turku University of Applied Sciences (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Team Dynamics and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.