Feasibility and Acceptability of the Cancer-Specific PRONTO Protocol for Nutritional Risk Screening in Outpatient Oncology Cancer Care: A Pilot Study

<b>Background</b>: Malnutrition or its risk is common among patients with cancer (from 15% to 90%) and can negatively impact treatment outcomes and quality of life. Early detection and nutritional intervention are essential to improve clinical, health, and economic outcomes. This study evaluates the PRONTO (PROtocol for NuTritional risk in Oncology), a novel tool designed for the early identification of nutritional risk in patients with cancer. <b>Objectives</b>: To assess the feasibility of the PRONTO in detecting nutritional risk among newly diagnosed oncology patients. <b>Methods</b>: This cross-sectional, observational pilot study included 200 patients from two oncology centers in Madrid, Spain. The PRONTO was applied during the first oncology visit. Nutritional risk was assessed using PRONTO and nutritional status was evaluated with the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria. Tool acceptability was measured using the System Usability Scale (SUS) and Net Promoter Score (NPS) among participating oncologists. <b>Results</b>: The PRONTO identified 62.0% of patients at nutritional risk, while malnutrition was confirmed in 57.0% of patients using GLIM criteria. The PRONTO demonstrated high sensitivity (90.4%) and specificity (75.6%) compared to the GLIM. Oncologists rated the PRONTO highly, with a SUS score of 87.9 and an NPS of 9.1, indicating strong usability and recommendation potential. <b>Conclusions</b>: The PRONTO is a feasible and practical tool for early nutritional risk screening in oncology settings. Its simplicity and efficiency support its integration into routine clinical practice. The high prevalence of nutritional risk underscores the need for early screening to guide timely nutrition care. Further research with larger and diverse groups of patients and oncologists is needed to validate scalability and assess the impact of nutritional interventions on patient outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2025-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17223697
Primary Topic
Nutrition and Health in Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feasibility and Acceptability of the Cancer-Specific PRONTO Protocol for Nutritional Risk Screening in Outpatient Oncology Cancer Care: A Pilot Study

Maurizio Muscaritoli, J. Durá Esteve, Laura Guzmán-Gómez, Samara Palma Milla et al.
Cancers
Nutrition and Health in Aging
article

Feasibility and Acceptability of the Cancer-Specific PRONTO Protocol for Nutritional Risk Screening in Outpatient Oncology Cancer Care: A Pilot Study

Maurizio Muscaritoli, J. Durá Esteve, Laura Guzmán-Gómez, Samara Palma Milla, Amy R. Sharn, A. Pertejo, Pablo Pérez-Wert, Germán Guzmán-Rolo, Suela Sulo, Darío Sánchez-Cabrero, Cristina Grande, Jaime Rubio, Andrea Martín Aguilar, Carolina Dassen
article en

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Malnutrition or its risk is common among patients with cancer (from 15% to 90%) and can negatively impact treatment outcomes and quality of life. Early detection and nutritional intervention are essential to improve clinical, health, and economic outcomes. This study evaluates the PRONTO (PROtocol for NuTritional risk in Oncology), a novel tool designed for the early identification of nutritional risk in patients with cancer. <b>Objectives</b>: To assess the feasibility of the PRONTO in detecting nutritional risk among newly diagnosed oncology patients. <b>Methods</b>: This cross-sectional, observational pilot study included 200 patients from two oncology centers in Madrid, Spain. The PRONTO was applied during the first oncology visit. Nutritional risk was assessed using PRONTO and nutritional status was evaluated with the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria. Tool acceptability was measured using the System Usability Scale (SUS) and Net Promoter Score (NPS) among participating oncologists. <b>Results</b>: The PRONTO identified 62.0% of patients at nutritional risk, while malnutrition was confirmed in 57.0% of patients using GLIM criteria. The PRONTO demonstrated high sensitivity (90.4%) and specificity (75.6%) compared to the GLIM. Oncologists rated the PRONTO highly, with a SUS score of 87.9 and an NPS of 9.1, indicating strong usability and recommendation potential. <b>Conclusions</b>: The PRONTO is a feasible and practical tool for early nutritional risk screening in oncology settings. Its simplicity and efficiency support its integration into routine clinical practice. The high prevalence of nutritional risk underscores the need for early screening to guide timely nutrition care. Further research with larger and diverse groups of patients and oncologists is needed to validate scalability and assess the impact of nutritional interventions on patient outcomes.

CancersVol. 17(22)
Hospital Universitario La Paz (ES), Abbott (United States) (US), Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research (ES), Abbott (Spain) (ES), Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz (ES), Ross Laboratories (United States) (US), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Nutrition and Health in Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.