LCA4Regions: application of life cycle methodologies for regional sustainability in Europe

Even as regions become important players in the attainment of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), effective action is often handicapped by the absence of an integrated life cycle approach to the various interconnected issues that regions confront. This study investigates the uptake and application of life cycle thinking by seven European sub-national regions, describing the use by their selected regional institutions of certain life cycle methodologies already in common use to enhance their sustainability initiatives. The EU Interreg project ‘LCA4Regions’ brought together seven regions from Finland, Italy, Lithuania, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, and Spain, respectively, to share their experience with various life cycle tools to enhance resource efficiency, circular economy, and waste management. Through engagement with stakeholders, a set of ‘Good Practice’ case studies were compiled showing various life cycle-based activities in the regions, and the underlying issues being addressed. Over 100 examples were identified of the life cycle-based initiatives of various sorts that were profitably employed by these regions. Overall, however, public institutions struggle to apply life cycle approaches systematically across their entire organisations, often limiting initiatives to isolated actions of restricted scope. Institutions mostly address SDGs individually rather than as an interdependent set, and there is a reluctance to take all parts of the supply chain into account. The lack of familiarity by regional officials with LCA procedures is exacerbated by the rigid structure and language of LCA that is not especially adapted for use by public administrations, thereby creating a gulf between research-oriented LCA and potential regional clients. Nonetheless, the LCA4Regions study shows an encouraging example of an increasing use of life cycle thinking for regional development in some parts of Europe. Further research is needed to understand the uptake of LCA and LCM in other European regions, and around the globe more generally.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Published
2025-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-025-02554-4
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

LCA4Regions: application of life cycle methodologies for regional sustainability in Europe

Sandra Elía Hurtado, Fritz Balkau, Guido Sonnemann, Jolanta Dvarionienė et al.
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
article

LCA4Regions: application of life cycle methodologies for regional sustainability in Europe

Sandra Elía Hurtado, Fritz Balkau, Guido Sonnemann, Jolanta Dvarionienė, Pekka Maijala, Takunda Y. Chitaka
article en

Abstract

Even as regions become important players in the attainment of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), effective action is often handicapped by the absence of an integrated life cycle approach to the various interconnected issues that regions confront. This study investigates the uptake and application of life cycle thinking by seven European sub-national regions, describing the use by their selected regional institutions of certain life cycle methodologies already in common use to enhance their sustainability initiatives. The EU Interreg project ‘LCA4Regions’ brought together seven regions from Finland, Italy, Lithuania, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, and Spain, respectively, to share their experience with various life cycle tools to enhance resource efficiency, circular economy, and waste management. Through engagement with stakeholders, a set of ‘Good Practice’ case studies were compiled showing various life cycle-based activities in the regions, and the underlying issues being addressed. Over 100 examples were identified of the life cycle-based initiatives of various sorts that were profitably employed by these regions. Overall, however, public institutions struggle to apply life cycle approaches systematically across their entire organisations, often limiting initiatives to isolated actions of restricted scope. Institutions mostly address SDGs individually rather than as an interdependent set, and there is a reluctance to take all parts of the supply chain into account. The lack of familiarity by regional officials with LCA procedures is exacerbated by the rigid structure and language of LCA that is not especially adapted for use by public administrations, thereby creating a gulf between research-oriented LCA and potential regional clients. Nonetheless, the LCA4Regions study shows an encouraging example of an increasing use of life cycle thinking for regional development in some parts of Europe. Further research is needed to understand the uptake of LCA and LCM in other European regions, and around the globe more generally.

The International Journal of Life Cycle AssessmentVol. 30(12)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université de Bordeaux (FR), Kaunas University of Technology (LT), Government of Spain (ES), Institut des Sciences Moléculaires (FR), Teollisuuden Voima (Finland) (FI), Institut Polytechnique de Bordeaux (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.