Can We Speak of an “Interaction” Between Ancient Christian Thought and Classical Greek Literature? Two Case Studies (The Trinity and Gen. 1:26)

This paper tries to analyse what “interaction” with classical Greek literature may mean in the case of ancient Christian texts. Two case studies show the existence of a “hermeneutical circle” between the reception of Greek texts among Christians and Christian ideas. The Christians were influenced by the Greek texts they commented on, but, on the other hand, their reception of such texts was determined by their Christian intellectual presuppositions. The first case (the emergence of the “Trinity” among the “apologists”) illustrates a cross-reading of Matthew 28:19 and Ps.-Plato’s Letter 2. The second case shows how the term ὁμοίωσις, in Genesis 1:26, was read in the light of Theaetetus 176a-b, and vice versa.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Religions
Published
2025-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16111468
Primary Topic
Karl Barth and Christian Theology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can We Speak of an “Interaction” Between Ancient Christian Thought and Classical Greek Literature? Two Case Studies (The Trinity and Gen. 1:26)

Sébastien Morlet
Religions
Karl Barth and Christian Theology
article

Can We Speak of an “Interaction” Between Ancient Christian Thought and Classical Greek Literature? Two Case Studies (The Trinity and Gen. 1:26)

Sébastien Morlet
article en

Abstract

This paper tries to analyse what “interaction” with classical Greek literature may mean in the case of ancient Christian texts. Two case studies show the existence of a “hermeneutical circle” between the reception of Greek texts among Christians and Christian ideas. The Christians were influenced by the Greek texts they commented on, but, on the other hand, their reception of such texts was determined by their Christian intellectual presuppositions. The first case (the emergence of the “Trinity” among the “apologists”) illustrates a cross-reading of Matthew 28:19 and Ps.-Plato’s Letter 2. The second case shows how the term ὁμοίωσις, in Genesis 1:26, was read in the light of Theaetetus 176a-b, and vice versa.

ReligionsVol. 16(11)
Université Sorbonne Nouvelle (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Karl Barth and Christian Theology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Can We Speak of an “Interaction” Between Ancient Christian Thought and Classical Greek Literature? Two Case Studies (The Trinity and Gen. 1:26) — Sébastien Morlet · Religions (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS