Long-term neurocognitive side effects of MDMA in recreational ecstasy users following sustained abstinence: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Little is known about whether 3,4-methylenedioxy-N-methamphetamine (MDMA) neurocognitive side effects improve with sustained abstinence. This study aimed to systematically review and synthesise the existing literature on the long-term neurocognitive side effects of recreational MDMA use after a minimum of 6 months of abstinence. We searched relevant databases utilising terms related to (1) MDMA and (2) neurocognition. A qualitative synthesis of study findings was organised with reference to the neurocognitive domains defined in the <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fifth Edition</i> (DSM5). Fourteen articles met the inclusion criteria, assessing learning and memory (<i>n</i> = 8), executive function (<i>n</i> = 10), complex attention (<i>n</i> = 5), language (<i>n</i> = 2) and perceptual motor function (<i>n</i> = 1). Meta-analysis and assessment of bias were undertaken only for the domain of 'learning and memory' and included five studies. People with current and previous MDMA use had poorer learning and memory performance compared to people who were MDMA-naïve (Hedges' <i>g</i> = -1.06 and -1.37, respectively); there was no significant difference between current and abstinent MDMA users (Hedges' <i>g</i> = 0.03). A longer period of abstinence did not demonstrate greater improvements or recovery in learning and memory. There was limited evidence to conclude that MDMA use is associated with neurocognitive impairments in other domains. Overall, these conclusions are based on low-quality findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Psychopharmacology
Published
2025-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02698811251389559
Primary Topic
Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Long-term neurocognitive side effects of MDMA in recreational ecstasy users following sustained abstinence: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Lars Eriksson, Eva Malacova, Zorica Jokovic, Mark Daglish et al.
Journal of Psychopharmacology
Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
article

Long-term neurocognitive side effects of MDMA in recreational ecstasy users following sustained abstinence: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Lars Eriksson, Eva Malacova, Zorica Jokovic, Mark Daglish, Gemma McKeon, Stephen Parker, Mark L. Vickers, Hillary Ung
article en

Abstract

Little is known about whether 3,4-methylenedioxy-N-methamphetamine (MDMA) neurocognitive side effects improve with sustained abstinence. This study aimed to systematically review and synthesise the existing literature on the long-term neurocognitive side effects of recreational MDMA use after a minimum of 6 months of abstinence. We searched relevant databases utilising terms related to (1) MDMA and (2) neurocognition. A qualitative synthesis of study findings was organised with reference to the neurocognitive domains defined in the <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fifth Edition</i> (DSM5). Fourteen articles met the inclusion criteria, assessing learning and memory (<i>n</i> = 8), executive function (<i>n</i> = 10), complex attention (<i>n</i> = 5), language (<i>n</i> = 2) and perceptual motor function (<i>n</i> = 1). Meta-analysis and assessment of bias were undertaken only for the domain of 'learning and memory' and included five studies. People with current and previous MDMA use had poorer learning and memory performance compared to people who were MDMA-naïve (Hedges' <i>g</i> = -1.06 and -1.37, respectively); there was no significant difference between current and abstinent MDMA users (Hedges' <i>g</i> = 0.03). A longer period of abstinence did not demonstrate greater improvements or recovery in learning and memory. There was limited evidence to conclude that MDMA use is associated with neurocognitive impairments in other domains. Overall, these conclusions are based on low-quality findings.

Journal of Psychopharmacology
Queensland Health (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute (AU), Metro South Health (AU), Ipswich Hospital (AU), Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.