Simplifying Prediction of Intended Grasp Type: Accelerometry Performs Comparably to Combined EMG-Accelerometry in Individuals With and Without Amputation

The adoption of active upper-limb prostheses with multiple degrees of freedom is largely lagging due to bulky designs and counterintuitive operation. Accurate gesture prediction with minimal sensors is key to enabling low-profile, user-friendly prosthetic devices. Wearable sensors, such as electromyography (EMG) and accelerometry (ACC) sensors, provide valuable signals for identifying patterns relating muscle activity and arm movement to specific gestures. This study investigates which sensor type (EMG or ACC) has the most valuable information to predict hand grasps and identifies the signal features contributing the most to grasp prediction performance. Using an open-source dataset, we trained two types of subject-specific classifiers (LDA & KNN) to predict 10 grasp types in 13 individuals with and 28 individuals without amputation. Having 4-fold cross-validation, LDA average accuracies using ACC only features (84.7%) were similar to combined ACC & EMG (88.3%) and much greater than with only EMG features (58.1%). Feature importance analysis showed that participants with amputation reached more than 80% accuracy using only three features, two of which were ACC-derived, while able-bodied participants required nine features, with greater reliance on EMG. These findings suggest that ACC is sufficient for robust grasp classification in individuals with amputation and can support simpler, more accessible prosthetic designs. Future work should focus on incorporating object and grip force detection alongside grasp recognition and testing model performance in real-time prosthetic control settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2025-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s25226984
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.67

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Simplifying Prediction of Intended Grasp Type: Accelerometry Performs Comparably to Combined EMG-Accelerometry in Individuals With and Without Amputation

Deema Totah, Rachel V. Vitali, Samira Afshari
1 citations
Sensors
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
0.67
article

Simplifying Prediction of Intended Grasp Type: Accelerometry Performs Comparably to Combined EMG-Accelerometry in Individuals With and Without Amputation

Deema Totah, Rachel V. Vitali, Samira Afshari
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The adoption of active upper-limb prostheses with multiple degrees of freedom is largely lagging due to bulky designs and counterintuitive operation. Accurate gesture prediction with minimal sensors is key to enabling low-profile, user-friendly prosthetic devices. Wearable sensors, such as electromyography (EMG) and accelerometry (ACC) sensors, provide valuable signals for identifying patterns relating muscle activity and arm movement to specific gestures. This study investigates which sensor type (EMG or ACC) has the most valuable information to predict hand grasps and identifies the signal features contributing the most to grasp prediction performance. Using an open-source dataset, we trained two types of subject-specific classifiers (LDA & KNN) to predict 10 grasp types in 13 individuals with and 28 individuals without amputation. Having 4-fold cross-validation, LDA average accuracies using ACC only features (84.7%) were similar to combined ACC & EMG (88.3%) and much greater than with only EMG features (58.1%). Feature importance analysis showed that participants with amputation reached more than 80% accuracy using only three features, two of which were ACC-derived, while able-bodied participants required nine features, with greater reliance on EMG. These findings suggest that ACC is sufficient for robust grasp classification in individuals with amputation and can support simpler, more accessible prosthetic designs. Future work should focus on incorporating object and grip force detection alongside grasp recognition and testing model performance in real-time prosthetic control settings.

SensorsVol. 25(22)
University of Iowa (US)
U.S. Department of Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
0.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.