Insights and limitations of endometrial cancer risk prediction models for clinical applicability: a systematic review

Current EC risk prediction models show moderate performance but suffer from limited external validation, homogeneity in demographics, and exclusion of diverse populations. Future research should focus on broadening participant diversity and incorporating new risk factors, such as hormonal intrauterine device use, hysterectomies, environmental exposures, and socio-economic status. Developing dynamic models that account for these factors and model outcomes that span various forms of the disease can improve clinical relevance. Personalized, risk-based approaches targeting high-risk groups may offer a viable path forward for EC screening and prevention strategies, ensuring more equitable cancer care and improving patient outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Cancer
Published
2025-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-15200-x
Primary Topic
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Insights and limitations of endometrial cancer risk prediction models for clinical applicability: a systematic review

Sabine El‐Halabi, Aline Talhouk, Aiping Luo
BMC Cancer
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
article

Insights and limitations of endometrial cancer risk prediction models for clinical applicability: a systematic review

Sabine El‐Halabi, Aline Talhouk, Aiping Luo
article en

Abstract

Current EC risk prediction models show moderate performance but suffer from limited external validation, homogeneity in demographics, and exclusion of diverse populations. Future research should focus on broadening participant diversity and incorporating new risk factors, such as hormonal intrauterine device use, hysterectomies, environmental exposures, and socio-economic status. Developing dynamic models that account for these factors and model outcomes that span various forms of the disease can improve clinical relevance. Personalized, risk-based approaches targeting high-risk groups may offer a viable path forward for EC screening and prevention strategies, ensuring more equitable cancer care and improving patient outcomes.

BMC CancerVol. 25(1)
University of British Columbia (CA)
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.