Destruction or renewal? Trumpism and the future of global governance

Abstract This paper assesses the impact of Trumpism on global governance. Although Trump II poses an even greater challenge than Trump I , we argue that the continued decline of global governance and the resurgence of traditional (great) power politics that does not respect institutional constraints is not inevitable. Rather, the rise of Trumpism may also act as a catalyst for the innovative adaptation of global governance arrangements, enabling more effective responses not only to a rapidly evolving political landscape but also to emerging governance challenges. The impact of Trump II will ultimately depend on how major powers that support global governance institutions respond. Due to heightened geopolitical conflicts, defenders of those institutions may find themselves more constrained under Trump II than they were during his first term. While this raises the realistic prospect of further erosion of global governance, we argue that it remains possible for defenders to cope with the challenges of Trumpism, potentially even by spearheading an adaptive renewal of global governance arrangements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Public Policy and Governance
Published
2025-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43508-025-00130-y
Primary Topic
Globalization and political ideologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Destruction or renewal? Trumpism and the future of global governance

Benjamin Faude, Tim Heinkelmann‐Wild
Global Public Policy and Governance
Globalization and political ideologies
article

Destruction or renewal? Trumpism and the future of global governance

Benjamin Faude, Tim Heinkelmann‐Wild
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper assesses the impact of Trumpism on global governance. Although Trump II poses an even greater challenge than Trump I , we argue that the continued decline of global governance and the resurgence of traditional (great) power politics that does not respect institutional constraints is not inevitable. Rather, the rise of Trumpism may also act as a catalyst for the innovative adaptation of global governance arrangements, enabling more effective responses not only to a rapidly evolving political landscape but also to emerging governance challenges. The impact of Trump II will ultimately depend on how major powers that support global governance institutions respond. Due to heightened geopolitical conflicts, defenders of those institutions may find themselves more constrained under Trump II than they were during his first term. While this raises the realistic prospect of further erosion of global governance, we argue that it remains possible for defenders to cope with the challenges of Trumpism, potentially even by spearheading an adaptive renewal of global governance arrangements.

Global Public Policy and GovernanceVol. 5(4)
University of Applied Sciences Appollon (DE), University of Glasgow (GB), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE), European University Institute (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Globalization and political ideologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.