Impact of surgeon experience on patient outcomes after pelvic and acetabular fracture surgery

Emerging data suggests present day surgeons coming out of training are treating fewer pelvic and acetabular injuries in practice than their predecessors. Few studies have investigated the acute effects of this in the perioperative setting, despite the critical condition of many of these patients. Accordingly, there is a need now for studies that examine how surgeon experience affects short-term outcomes in this patient population. This is a retrospective cohort performed at a level I trauma center at UCSF- Fresno. Patients who underwent operative fixation for pelvic and/or acetabular fractures treated by a single fellowship-trained orthopaedic trauma surgeon year 1 through year 7 in practice were included. Electronic medical records were retrospectively reviewed for data collection. Yearly time points for surgeon experience were defined and compared. The primary outcome was acute surgical complications within six weeks. Secondary outcome measurements were estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, transfusion requirements, and unplanned re-operation. Two hundred and six patients met study criteria. There was a significant difference in complications during year 1 versus after year 1: 16.7% and 4.5%, respectively (p = 0.026), and between years 1–2 and after year 2, 13.3% and 3.4%, respectively, (p = 0.022). There was no difference in complications after 2 years. Average operative time in the first year was 271.5 minutes, whereas average operative time for years 2-7 was 185.1 minutes (p=0.016). This difference remained significant until after year 4. There was a significant difference in estimated blood loss (EBL) between post-training years 0-2 and years 2+: 505.5 mL and 263.6 mL, respectively (p = 0.039). There was a significance difference in EBL between years 0-3 versus years 3+. There was no statistically significant difference after this. There was no difference in transfusions received or unplanned re-operations at all time points. There was no difference in complications at most time points. Despite statistically significant decreases in operative times and blood loss over the first five years in practice, pelvis and acetabular surgeries were shown to have significant blood loss and surgical time regardless of experience. Furthermore, there were no differences in transfusions and unplanned re-operations at all time points, suggesting that fellowship-trained surgeons in high-volume centers can safely treat these complex procedures without a clinically significant increase in morbidity early in their careers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Patient Safety in Surgery
Published
2025-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-025-00455-x
Primary Topic
Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of surgeon experience on patient outcomes after pelvic and acetabular fracture surgery

Armen Martirosian, Emilio Robles, Mark Ayoub, Yeng Vue et al.
Patient Safety in Surgery
Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
article

Impact of surgeon experience on patient outcomes after pelvic and acetabular fracture surgery

Armen Martirosian, Emilio Robles, Mark Ayoub, Yeng Vue, Jetha Tallapaneni
article en

Abstract

Emerging data suggests present day surgeons coming out of training are treating fewer pelvic and acetabular injuries in practice than their predecessors. Few studies have investigated the acute effects of this in the perioperative setting, despite the critical condition of many of these patients. Accordingly, there is a need now for studies that examine how surgeon experience affects short-term outcomes in this patient population. This is a retrospective cohort performed at a level I trauma center at UCSF- Fresno. Patients who underwent operative fixation for pelvic and/or acetabular fractures treated by a single fellowship-trained orthopaedic trauma surgeon year 1 through year 7 in practice were included. Electronic medical records were retrospectively reviewed for data collection. Yearly time points for surgeon experience were defined and compared. The primary outcome was acute surgical complications within six weeks. Secondary outcome measurements were estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, transfusion requirements, and unplanned re-operation. Two hundred and six patients met study criteria. There was a significant difference in complications during year 1 versus after year 1: 16.7% and 4.5%, respectively (p = 0.026), and between years 1–2 and after year 2, 13.3% and 3.4%, respectively, (p = 0.022). There was no difference in complications after 2 years. Average operative time in the first year was 271.5 minutes, whereas average operative time for years 2-7 was 185.1 minutes (p=0.016). This difference remained significant until after year 4. There was a significant difference in estimated blood loss (EBL) between post-training years 0-2 and years 2+: 505.5 mL and 263.6 mL, respectively (p = 0.039). There was a significance difference in EBL between years 0-3 versus years 3+. There was no statistically significant difference after this. There was no difference in transfusions received or unplanned re-operations at all time points. There was no difference in complications at most time points. Despite statistically significant decreases in operative times and blood loss over the first five years in practice, pelvis and acetabular surgeries were shown to have significant blood loss and surgical time regardless of experience. Furthermore, there were no differences in transfusions and unplanned re-operations at all time points, suggesting that fellowship-trained surgeons in high-volume centers can safely treat these complex procedures without a clinically significant increase in morbidity early in their careers.

Patient Safety in SurgeryVol. 19(1)
University of California, San Francisco (US), California State University, Fresno (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.