Estimating the magnitude and scope of disability-related direct costs: a systematised review

Globally, people with disabilities face a heightened risk of poverty, the extent of which is often underestimated due to a failure to account for disability-related direct costs or “extra costs”. People with disabilities spend significant proportions of their income on additional goods and services (e.g. personal assistance, assistive devices, extra healthcare, transportation): paying out-of-pocket for these items can substantially lower their standard of living, while inability to meet these costs can affect their well-being and social participation. Estimating the magnitude and sources of disability-related direct costs is key for policy and planning, as it can affect determinations of poverty and also identify where additional investment may be needed to reduce the individual burden of these costs (e.g., through social protection, designing more inclusive services). To synthesize evidence from recent studies on the magnitude and sources of extra costs amongst people with disabilities, comparing how estimates differ by methodological approaches, settings and individual characteristics. We conducted a systematised review of studies published between 2015 and January 2023. Searches covered 10 databases and the grey literature. We retrieved 75 studies covering 67 countries, which reported substantial costs that often significantly increased the risk of poverty amongst people with disabilities. There was high heterogeneity across studies, depending on methodological approach and individual and contextual factors. These findings indicate a pressing need to offset individual spending on costs, such as through more extensive social protection and through designing more inclusive services (e.g., health, education, transport). There is also a need for more consensus on best practices for measuring extra costs across methodological approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The European Journal of Health Economics
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-025-01851-x
Primary Topic
Disability Education and Employment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating the magnitude and scope of disability-related direct costs: a systematised review

Daniel Mont, Ludovico Carraro, Zachary A. Morris, Mercoledi Nasiir et al.
The European Journal of Health Economics
Disability Education and Employment
article

Estimating the magnitude and scope of disability-related direct costs: a systematised review

Daniel Mont, Ludovico Carraro, Zachary A. Morris, Mercoledi Nasiir, Stephen McGarity, Lena Morgon Banks, Sara Rotenberg, Mónica Pinilla‐Roncancio, Jill Hanass‐Hancock, P. Brian Smith, Sophie Mitra, Alex Cote
article en

Abstract

Globally, people with disabilities face a heightened risk of poverty, the extent of which is often underestimated due to a failure to account for disability-related direct costs or “extra costs”. People with disabilities spend significant proportions of their income on additional goods and services (e.g. personal assistance, assistive devices, extra healthcare, transportation): paying out-of-pocket for these items can substantially lower their standard of living, while inability to meet these costs can affect their well-being and social participation. Estimating the magnitude and sources of disability-related direct costs is key for policy and planning, as it can affect determinations of poverty and also identify where additional investment may be needed to reduce the individual burden of these costs (e.g., through social protection, designing more inclusive services). To synthesize evidence from recent studies on the magnitude and sources of extra costs amongst people with disabilities, comparing how estimates differ by methodological approaches, settings and individual characteristics. We conducted a systematised review of studies published between 2015 and January 2023. Searches covered 10 databases and the grey literature. We retrieved 75 studies covering 67 countries, which reported substantial costs that often significantly increased the risk of poverty amongst people with disabilities. There was high heterogeneity across studies, depending on methodological approach and individual and contextual factors. These findings indicate a pressing need to offset individual spending on costs, such as through more extensive social protection and through designing more inclusive services (e.g., health, education, transport). There is also a need for more consensus on best practices for measuring extra costs across methodological approaches.

The European Journal of Health Economics
South African Medical Research Council (ZA), United Nations Children's Fund (US), University of London (GB), Universidad de Los Andes (CO), Fordham University (US), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), EsSALUD (PE), Stony Brook University (US), University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US), University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
International Labour Organization
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Disability Education and Employment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.