Sentiment and SWOT Analyses of DeepSeek AI: Insights from Media, Self-Perceptions, User Perceptions, and Literature

This study aims to conduct sentiment analysis and SWOT analysis of DeepSeek. The dataset consisted of four data sources: news articles, DeepSeek self-perception, users’ perceptions, and a comprehensive literature review. Sentiment analysis examined news articles from diverse Chinese and Western outlets, while SWOT analysis evaluated DeepSeek strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats based on DeepSeek self and users’ perceptions and literature. ATLAS.ti and SPSS were used for analysis. Chi-square analysis results revealed significant differences between Chinese and Western media portrayals. Chinese media expressed more positive and fewer negative sentiments, whereas Western media expressed more negative and fewer positive sentiments, with both primarily neutral. Chinese media positive sentiment emphasized innovation, self-reliance, and global AI leadership, while negative sentiment sharply focused on technical and ethical challenges. Western media positive sentiment highlighted efficiency and technological advancement, while negative sentiment emphasized market disruption, geopolitical tensions, and security concerns. The SWOT analysis of DeepSeek self-perception indicated deliberate management of identity and accountability, with user-centered prompts eliciting detailed responses than tool-focused prompts. Users’ perceptions highlighted DeepSeek strengths in efficiency and accessibility, while noting weaknesses in accuracy and ecosystem maturity. Opportunities were identified in education, equity, and interdisciplinary applications, alongside threats related to misinformation, automation risks, and the potential for ethical misuse. The literature corroborated these findings, highlightingstrengths include performance, efficiency, reasoning capabilities, low cost, and open-source deployment;limitations involve data quality, bias, and privacy concerns; opportunities exist in education, industry, and task-specific applications; and threats include reliability and over-reliance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAGE Open
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251395226
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sentiment and SWOT Analyses of DeepSeek AI: Insights from Media, Self-Perceptions, User Perceptions, and Literature

Wali Khan Monib
SAGE Open
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Sentiment and SWOT Analyses of DeepSeek AI: Insights from Media, Self-Perceptions, User Perceptions, and Literature

Wali Khan Monib
article en

Abstract

This study aims to conduct sentiment analysis and SWOT analysis of DeepSeek. The dataset consisted of four data sources: news articles, DeepSeek self-perception, users’ perceptions, and a comprehensive literature review. Sentiment analysis examined news articles from diverse Chinese and Western outlets, while SWOT analysis evaluated DeepSeek strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats based on DeepSeek self and users’ perceptions and literature. ATLAS.ti and SPSS were used for analysis. Chi-square analysis results revealed significant differences between Chinese and Western media portrayals. Chinese media expressed more positive and fewer negative sentiments, whereas Western media expressed more negative and fewer positive sentiments, with both primarily neutral. Chinese media positive sentiment emphasized innovation, self-reliance, and global AI leadership, while negative sentiment sharply focused on technical and ethical challenges. Western media positive sentiment highlighted efficiency and technological advancement, while negative sentiment emphasized market disruption, geopolitical tensions, and security concerns. The SWOT analysis of DeepSeek self-perception indicated deliberate management of identity and accountability, with user-centered prompts eliciting detailed responses than tool-focused prompts. Users’ perceptions highlighted DeepSeek strengths in efficiency and accessibility, while noting weaknesses in accuracy and ecosystem maturity. Opportunities were identified in education, equity, and interdisciplinary applications, alongside threats related to misinformation, automation risks, and the potential for ethical misuse. The literature corroborated these findings, highlightingstrengths include performance, efficiency, reasoning capabilities, low cost, and open-source deployment;limitations involve data quality, bias, and privacy concerns; opportunities exist in education, industry, and task-specific applications; and threats include reliability and over-reliance.

SAGE OpenVol. 15(4)
Khost University (AF)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Sentiment and SWOT Analyses of DeepSeek AI: Insights from Media, Self-Perceptions, User Perceptions, and Literature — Wali Khan Monib · SAGE Open (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS