The Effect of Tax and Public Debt on Economic Growth: Worldwide Cross-Sectional Evidence

The objective of this study is to examine the effect of taxes and public debt on economic growth. By using a battery of tests and procedures (including quantile regression and extreme bounds analysis) on a set of cross-sectional data covering 177 countries, we found strong evidence to support the hypothesis that both taxes and public debt retard growth. However, it is demonstrated that reducing the tax rate (particularly the corporate tax rate) has no effect on growth and that the tax burden is the variable that is more relevant to growth. This finding is explained in terms of the proposition that wage and salary earners, who bear the brunt of the tax burden, have a high marginal propensity to consume. This means that reducing the tax rate for the rich and corporations is less effective than reducing the overall tax burden by cutting taxes on the wages and salaries of the middle class. JEL Classification: O43, O47

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAGE Open
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251397671
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effect of Tax and Public Debt on Economic Growth: Worldwide Cross-Sectional Evidence

Ibrahim Naser Khatatbeh, Ebrahim Merza
1 citations
SAGE Open
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
3.13
article

The Effect of Tax and Public Debt on Economic Growth: Worldwide Cross-Sectional Evidence

Ibrahim Naser Khatatbeh, Ebrahim Merza
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The objective of this study is to examine the effect of taxes and public debt on economic growth. By using a battery of tests and procedures (including quantile regression and extreme bounds analysis) on a set of cross-sectional data covering 177 countries, we found strong evidence to support the hypothesis that both taxes and public debt retard growth. However, it is demonstrated that reducing the tax rate (particularly the corporate tax rate) has no effect on growth and that the tax burden is the variable that is more relevant to growth. This finding is explained in terms of the proposition that wage and salary earners, who bear the brunt of the tax burden, have a high marginal propensity to consume. This means that reducing the tax rate for the rich and corporations is less effective than reducing the overall tax burden by cutting taxes on the wages and salaries of the middle class. JEL Classification: O43, O47

SAGE OpenVol. 15(4)
Hashemite University (JO), Kuwait University (KW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.