The (Re)Production, Negotiation, and Navigation of Social Asymmetries‐in‐Action: An Introduction to the Special Issue

This article reconsiders, and argues for, the contribution of ethnomethodological and conversation analytic research (EM/CA) to the understanding of social asymmetries in action. As well as highlighting the significance of the approach in describing the interactional “machinery” of supposedly “Big” social issues such as injustice, exclusion, and discrimination, it also considers some of the tensions that have been discussed by key scholars in the field. We discuss how EM/CA provides an alternate approach to the understanding of social inequality and argue against assessing the contribution of EM/CA within the dominant dualism of formal social science (for example, between “micro” and “macro” or “structure” and “agency”). We return to some classic and foundational works in the corpus of EM/CA studies as well as more contemporary studies which have, in different ways, informed the articles of the special issue that this article introduces. In sum, the article roughly maps the terrain from which this special issue emerged and aims to advance EM/CA research relating to social issues (e.g., ableism, racism) as they are produced, negotiated, and made accountable in situ .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Symbolic Interaction
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.70029
Primary Topic
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The (Re)Production, Negotiation, and Navigation of Social Asymmetries‐in‐Action: An Introduction to the Special Issue

Robin Smith, Catherine L. Tam
Symbolic Interaction
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
article

The (Re)Production, Negotiation, and Navigation of Social Asymmetries‐in‐Action: An Introduction to the Special Issue

Robin Smith, Catherine L. Tam
article en

Abstract

This article reconsiders, and argues for, the contribution of ethnomethodological and conversation analytic research (EM/CA) to the understanding of social asymmetries in action. As well as highlighting the significance of the approach in describing the interactional “machinery” of supposedly “Big” social issues such as injustice, exclusion, and discrimination, it also considers some of the tensions that have been discussed by key scholars in the field. We discuss how EM/CA provides an alternate approach to the understanding of social inequality and argue against assessing the contribution of EM/CA within the dominant dualism of formal social science (for example, between “micro” and “macro” or “structure” and “agency”). We return to some classic and foundational works in the corpus of EM/CA studies as well as more contemporary studies which have, in different ways, informed the articles of the special issue that this article introduces. In sum, the article roughly maps the terrain from which this special issue emerged and aims to advance EM/CA research relating to social issues (e.g., ableism, racism) as they are produced, negotiated, and made accountable in situ .

Symbolic InteractionVol. 48(4)
University of the Witwatersrand (ZA), Cardiff University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.