Paradoxical sets and the Axiom of Choice

Abstract The thesis is thematically divided into two parts: Algebraic closures of certain subfields of the reals (Part I) and Paradoxical sets of reals (Part II). Part I investigates a folklore result about the forcing extension by one Cohen real: the transcendence degree of the reals over the set of reals in the ground model is of cardinality $\mathfrak {c}$ (in the extension). We extend this to the case in which more Cohen reals are added, obtaining the following result: Theorem A. Let X be a finite set of mutually generic Cohen reals over V . In $V[X]$ , consider the minimum field $F\subseteq \mathbb {R}$ such that $F\supseteq \bigcup _{Y\subsetneq X} \mathbb {R}^{V[Y]}$ . Then, in $V[X]$ the transcendence degree of $\mathbb {R}$ over F is continuum. In Part II, we consider some paradoxical sets of reals and study their interaction with the Axiom of Choice. Informally, paradoxical sets are subsets of $\mathbb {R}^n$ that can be constructed using the Axiom of Choice. In this work we focus on the following examples of paradoxical sets: Hamel bases of $\mathbb {R}$ as a $\mathbb {Q}$ -vector space, two-point sets or Mazurkiewicz sets , and partitions of $\mathbb {R}^3$ into unit circles ( PUC ). The known proofs of existence of these objects rely on a transfinite induction on a well-order of the reals. The main question considered through this work is the following: Can we recover some weakening of the Axiom of Choice from the existence of a particular paradoxical set? This thesis gives negative answers for different versions of this question, changing the particular paradoxical set, and the weakening of the Axiom of Choice considered. Furthermore, the main contribution of this thesis is the development of a framework that produces some of these answers and recovers other known results of similar form. In particular we obtain the following applications: Theorem B. There is a model of $\mathsf {ZF}+\mathsf {DC}$ with a Hamel basis and no free ultrafilter on $\omega $ . Theorem C. There is a model of $\mathsf {ZF}+\mathsf {DC}$ with a partition of $\mathbb {R}^3$ in unit circles but without a wellordering on the reals. Abstract prepared by Azul Fatalini E-mail: [email protected] URL: <jats:uri xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of Symbolic Logic
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/bsl.2025.10124
Primary Topic
Advanced Topology and Set Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Paradoxical sets and the Axiom of Choice

Azul Fatalini
Bulletin of Symbolic Logic
Advanced Topology and Set Theory
article

Paradoxical sets and the Axiom of Choice

Azul Fatalini
article en

Abstract

Abstract The thesis is thematically divided into two parts: Algebraic closures of certain subfields of the reals (Part I) and Paradoxical sets of reals (Part II). Part I investigates a folklore result about the forcing extension by one Cohen real: the transcendence degree of the reals over the set of reals in the ground model is of cardinality $\mathfrak {c}$ (in the extension). We extend this to the case in which more Cohen reals are added, obtaining the following result: Theorem A. Let X be a finite set of mutually generic Cohen reals over V . In $V[X]$ , consider the minimum field $F\subseteq \mathbb {R}$ such that $F\supseteq \bigcup _{Y\subsetneq X} \mathbb {R}^{V[Y]}$ . Then, in $V[X]$ the transcendence degree of $\mathbb {R}$ over F is continuum. In Part II, we consider some paradoxical sets of reals and study their interaction with the Axiom of Choice. Informally, paradoxical sets are subsets of $\mathbb {R}^n$ that can be constructed using the Axiom of Choice. In this work we focus on the following examples of paradoxical sets: Hamel bases of $\mathbb {R}$ as a $\mathbb {Q}$ -vector space, two-point sets or Mazurkiewicz sets , and partitions of $\mathbb {R}^3$ into unit circles ( PUC ). The known proofs of existence of these objects rely on a transfinite induction on a well-order of the reals. The main question considered through this work is the following: Can we recover some weakening of the Axiom of Choice from the existence of a particular paradoxical set? This thesis gives negative answers for different versions of this question, changing the particular paradoxical set, and the weakening of the Axiom of Choice considered. Furthermore, the main contribution of this thesis is the development of a framework that produces some of these answers and recovers other known results of similar form. In particular we obtain the following applications: Theorem B. There is a model of $\mathsf {ZF}+\mathsf {DC}$ with a Hamel basis and no free ultrafilter on $\omega $ . Theorem C. There is a model of $\mathsf {ZF}+\mathsf {DC}$ with a partition of $\mathbb {R}^3$ in unit circles but without a wellordering on the reals. Abstract prepared by Azul Fatalini E-mail: [email protected] URL: <jats:uri xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:

Bulletin of Symbolic Logic
University of Münster (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Advanced Topology and Set Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.