Risk analysis methodology for ship-bridge allisions – A combined probability and consequence analysis

Ship-bridge allision risk assessments often address either probability or consequence; integrations of both in a unified methodology are rare. This paper fills that gap by introducing Ship Traffic Allision Probability using Monte Carlo Simulations – consequence (STAPS-cons), a methodology where a mid-fidelity simulation methodology developed for probability assessment is used together with the results of Finite Element Analysis (FEA) simulations to include consequence assessments. Using Automatic Information System (AIS) data and the proposed methodology, a potential bridge over Norway’s Bjørnafjorden is analysed in a case study to determine the risk of structural collapse. The case study also illustrates how the risk is affected by different input parameters, both related to probability and consequence estimations. Five scenarios were analysed in this case study; three passed and two failed the Norwegian criterion for the probability of structural collapse, which is less frequent than 10 −4 per year. A 20 % increase in the duration of a ship’s miss of turning point notably raised both the allision frequencies and the necessary levels of energy the bridge must withstand. In another scenario, where a less stiff bridge structure was analysed, the demand on the global structure decreased. In conclusion, the STAPS-cons methodology represents a significant advancement in the field of ship-bridge allision risk assessment. By integrating probability and consequence assessments, this methodology offers a more robust and comprehensive tool for managing the risks associated with increased shipping traffic and bridge construction in navigational waters. • Introduces STAPS-cons: a unified ship-bridge allision risk assessment method. • Integrates probability and consequence in one simulation-based framework. • Demonstrates impact of structural stiffness and failure time on risk of collapse. • Supports design decisions by linking navigation and structural safety analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Structures
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.121731
Primary Topic
Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk analysis methodology for ship-bridge allisions – A combined probability and consequence analysis

Olov Lundbäck, Yanyan Sha, Jonas W. Ringsberg, Wengang Mao et al.
Engineering Structures
Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
article

Risk analysis methodology for ship-bridge allisions – A combined probability and consequence analysis

Olov Lundbäck, Yanyan Sha, Jonas W. Ringsberg, Wengang Mao, Axel Hörteborn
article en

Abstract

Ship-bridge allision risk assessments often address either probability or consequence; integrations of both in a unified methodology are rare. This paper fills that gap by introducing Ship Traffic Allision Probability using Monte Carlo Simulations – consequence (STAPS-cons), a methodology where a mid-fidelity simulation methodology developed for probability assessment is used together with the results of Finite Element Analysis (FEA) simulations to include consequence assessments. Using Automatic Information System (AIS) data and the proposed methodology, a potential bridge over Norway’s Bjørnafjorden is analysed in a case study to determine the risk of structural collapse. The case study also illustrates how the risk is affected by different input parameters, both related to probability and consequence estimations. Five scenarios were analysed in this case study; three passed and two failed the Norwegian criterion for the probability of structural collapse, which is less frequent than 10 −4 per year. A 20 % increase in the duration of a ship’s miss of turning point notably raised both the allision frequencies and the necessary levels of energy the bridge must withstand. In another scenario, where a less stiff bridge structure was analysed, the demand on the global structure decreased. In conclusion, the STAPS-cons methodology represents a significant advancement in the field of ship-bridge allision risk assessment. By integrating probability and consequence assessments, this methodology offers a more robust and comprehensive tool for managing the risks associated with increased shipping traffic and bridge construction in navigational waters. • Introduces STAPS-cons: a unified ship-bridge allision risk assessment method. • Integrates probability and consequence in one simulation-based framework. • Demonstrates impact of structural stiffness and failure time on risk of collapse. • Supports design decisions by linking navigation and structural safety analysis.

Engineering StructuresVol. 347
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden (SE), Chalmers University of Technology (SE), University of Stavanger (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.