Balancing speed and experience: the cognitive and affective impacts of playback acceleration in digital media consumption

Playback-speed controls are ubiquitous on media platforms, yet their effects on viewers' experience and outcomes are not fully understood. We examined how acceleration influences cognitive engagement, affective experience (satisfaction, discomfort, perceived distortions), speaker perceptions, and behavioral intentions, and whether motivational cues (quiz expectancy) shape these effects. Three preregistered experiments exposed adults to either procedural or conceptual videos at standard or accelerated speeds. Studies 2a-2b additionally manipulated quiz expectancy and included a brief objective quiz. Outcomes were assessed with multi-item self-report scales; Study 2a-2b quiz scores provided objective performance. Analyses used ANOVA with study-specific factors. Across studies, faster playback reliably increased perceived distortions and modestly reduced satisfaction. Effects on cognitive engagement, discomfort, and speaker favorability were limited and context-dependent (varying by content type and audience). Quiz expectancy sometimes enhanced engagement at faster speeds, particularly among students. Behavioral intentions to reengage with content showed no reliable differences by speed, and objective quiz performance did not differ by speed. Playback speed is a consequential design variable whose effects depend on content demands, audience characteristics, and motivational context. Thoughtful, context-aware integration of speed controls-especially in educational settings-can help preserve experiential quality without sacrificing efficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1664580
Primary Topic
Media Influence and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Balancing speed and experience: the cognitive and affective impacts of playback acceleration in digital media consumption

Jonathan Lim, Ye Li, Rasam Dorri, Rich Yueh
Frontiers in Psychology
Media Influence and Health
article

Balancing speed and experience: the cognitive and affective impacts of playback acceleration in digital media consumption

Jonathan Lim, Ye Li, Rasam Dorri, Rich Yueh
article en

Abstract

Playback-speed controls are ubiquitous on media platforms, yet their effects on viewers' experience and outcomes are not fully understood. We examined how acceleration influences cognitive engagement, affective experience (satisfaction, discomfort, perceived distortions), speaker perceptions, and behavioral intentions, and whether motivational cues (quiz expectancy) shape these effects. Three preregistered experiments exposed adults to either procedural or conceptual videos at standard or accelerated speeds. Studies 2a-2b additionally manipulated quiz expectancy and included a brief objective quiz. Outcomes were assessed with multi-item self-report scales; Study 2a-2b quiz scores provided objective performance. Analyses used ANOVA with study-specific factors. Across studies, faster playback reliably increased perceived distortions and modestly reduced satisfaction. Effects on cognitive engagement, discomfort, and speaker favorability were limited and context-dependent (varying by content type and audience). Quiz expectancy sometimes enhanced engagement at faster speeds, particularly among students. Behavioral intentions to reengage with content showed no reliable differences by speed, and objective quiz performance did not differ by speed. Playback speed is a consequential design variable whose effects depend on content demands, audience characteristics, and motivational context. Thoughtful, context-aware integration of speed controls-especially in educational settings-can help preserve experiential quality without sacrificing efficiency.

Frontiers in PsychologyVol. 16
University of California, Riverside (US)
University of California, Riverside
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Media Influence and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.