Managing Intellectual Property in China: A Multidisciplinary Review and Recommendations for Future Research

Abstract Despite extensive media coverage on issues related to intellectual property (IP) in China, the academic literature on this topic has been sporadic. Two factors might be at play here. One is the multifaceted nature of IP: as IP is a legal asset with significant implications for firm performance and social welfare, the literature is scattered in various disciplines such as law, economics, strategy, and political science. The other is the unique institutional environment in China: policy-driven investments in IP have resulted in the decoupling of IP as a value appropriation mechanism in market competition and IP as a nonmarket strategy to engage with regulators. This review aims to bring the multiple streams of literature into a structured framework, with a side-by-side comparison with research based in developed countries, mostly in the US. Building on the combined research streams, we then recommend avenues of future research that can potentially speak to a broad audience in innovation, competition, and nonmarket strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management and Organization Review
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2025.10089
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Intellectual Property and Patents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.76

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Managing Intellectual Property in China: A Multidisciplinary Review and Recommendations for Future Research

Jiayue Sun, Minyuan Zhao, Shixiang Wang
1 citations
Management and Organization Review
Intellectual Property and Patents
2.76
article

Managing Intellectual Property in China: A Multidisciplinary Review and Recommendations for Future Research

Jiayue Sun, Minyuan Zhao, Shixiang Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Despite extensive media coverage on issues related to intellectual property (IP) in China, the academic literature on this topic has been sporadic. Two factors might be at play here. One is the multifaceted nature of IP: as IP is a legal asset with significant implications for firm performance and social welfare, the literature is scattered in various disciplines such as law, economics, strategy, and political science. The other is the unique institutional environment in China: policy-driven investments in IP have resulted in the decoupling of IP as a value appropriation mechanism in market competition and IP as a nonmarket strategy to engage with regulators. This review aims to bring the multiple streams of literature into a structured framework, with a side-by-side comparison with research based in developed countries, mostly in the US. Building on the combined research streams, we then recommend avenues of future research that can potentially speak to a broad audience in innovation, competition, and nonmarket strategies.

Management and Organization ReviewVol. 21(5)
Shanghai University of Finance and Economics (CN), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Zhejiang University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Intellectual Property and Patents
2.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.