Epistemic Justice, Co-Production and HREDD: A Three-Step Agenda for Advancing Business and Human Rights Research

Abstract This study presents three key steps to enable the Business and Human Rights (BHR) research agenda to promote and advance greater applicability to the emerging challenges in the field. Drawing on research conducted on BHR sources (almost exclusively by Brazilian and Spanish-speaking authors), this article aims to demonstrate the need for further BHR scholarship to simultaneously: (i) identify and remedy epistemic biases through reflexive engagement with a victim-centred scholarship from the Global South that recentres BHR research on the perspective of affected communities; (ii) move from consideration to co-production by grounding BHR theory in practice via participatory methodologies and dialogue between communities, researchers and corporations; and (iii) by aligning with steps one and two, recontextualize Human Rights Due Diligence (HRDD) research into an integrated Human Rights and Environmental Due Diligence (HREDD) approach that incorporates environmental and climate dimensions and ensure meaningful, victim-centred engagement with affected communities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business and Human Rights Journal
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2025.10026
Primary Topic
Mining and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Epistemic Justice, Co-Production and HREDD: A Three-Step Agenda for Advancing Business and Human Rights Research

Ana Cláudia Ruy Cardia
Business and Human Rights Journal
Mining and Resource Management
article

Epistemic Justice, Co-Production and HREDD: A Three-Step Agenda for Advancing Business and Human Rights Research

Ana Cláudia Ruy Cardia
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study presents three key steps to enable the Business and Human Rights (BHR) research agenda to promote and advance greater applicability to the emerging challenges in the field. Drawing on research conducted on BHR sources (almost exclusively by Brazilian and Spanish-speaking authors), this article aims to demonstrate the need for further BHR scholarship to simultaneously: (i) identify and remedy epistemic biases through reflexive engagement with a victim-centred scholarship from the Global South that recentres BHR research on the perspective of affected communities; (ii) move from consideration to co-production by grounding BHR theory in practice via participatory methodologies and dialogue between communities, researchers and corporations; and (iii) by aligning with steps one and two, recontextualize Human Rights Due Diligence (HRDD) research into an integrated Human Rights and Environmental Due Diligence (HREDD) approach that incorporates environmental and climate dimensions and ensure meaningful, victim-centred engagement with affected communities.

Business and Human Rights JournalVol. 10(2-3)
Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Mining and Resource Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Epistemic Justice, Co-Production and HREDD: A Three-Step Agenda for Advancing Business and Human Rights Research — Ana Cláudia Ruy Cardia · Business and Human Rights Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS