A Comparative Analysis of GPT-3.5, GPT-4, GPT–4 Omni, Gemini Advanced, and Gemini 1.5 in Answering Frequently Asked Questions Regarding High Tibial Osteotomy
This study showed that ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, ChatGPT-4 Omni, and Gemini 1.5 provided accurate and relevant responses on HTO, whereas Gemini Advanced exhibited limitations and underperformed in comparison with the other models.
Authors
- Seung Yong Shin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3408-6899)
- Jisun Shin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2147-5163)
- Si Young Song (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1417-4314)
- Hyobeom Lee (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3334-9180)
- Seong Hyeon Kim (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5036-5038)
- Ki Man Kang
Institutions
- Sacred Heart Hospital (NG)
- AP Systems (South Korea) (KR)
- Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital (KR)
- Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong (KR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
- Published
- 2025-11-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671251385127
- Primary Topic
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00