Performance Comparison of Dlfloat16 and Bfloat16 Binary Formats

The 16-bit floating-point format is a popular alternative to the widely used 32 -bit floating-point format (FP32). This study analyzes the performance of two commonly employed 16-bit versions, dlfloat16 and bfloat16, for data with Laplacian and Gaussian distribution. The applied performance metric is the signal-to-quantization noise ratio (SQNR), allowed by using the connection between the floating-point format and piecewise uniform quantization. It is shown over a wide range of input data variances that SQNR results for Laplacian and Gaussian data differ slightly, indicating that both observed formats are robust to changes in the data distribution. SQNR analysis also suggested that dlfloat16 is a better option when increased calculation precision is required, while bfloat16 is better from a dynamic range perspective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/telsiks65061.2025.11240708
Primary Topic
Numerical Methods and Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance Comparison of Dlfloat16 and Bfloat16 Binary Formats

Milan Dinčić, Zoran Perić, Marko Andjelković, Bojan Denić et al.
Numerical Methods and Algorithms
article

Performance Comparison of Dlfloat16 and Bfloat16 Binary Formats

Milan Dinčić, Zoran Perić, Marko Andjelković, Bojan Denić, Sofija Perić
article en

Abstract

The 16-bit floating-point format is a popular alternative to the widely used 32 -bit floating-point format (FP32). This study analyzes the performance of two commonly employed 16-bit versions, dlfloat16 and bfloat16, for data with Laplacian and Gaussian distribution. The applied performance metric is the signal-to-quantization noise ratio (SQNR), allowed by using the connection between the floating-point format and piecewise uniform quantization. It is shown over a wide range of input data variances that SQNR results for Laplacian and Gaussian data differ slightly, indicating that both observed formats are robust to changes in the data distribution. SQNR analysis also suggested that dlfloat16 is a better option when increased calculation precision is required, while bfloat16 is better from a dynamic range perspective.

University of Nis (RS), Leibniz Institute for High Performance Microelectronics (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Numerical Methods and Algorithms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Performance Comparison of Dlfloat16 and Bfloat16 Binary Formats — Milan Dinčić, Zoran Perić, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS