The Salesforce of safety: Software vendors as infrastructural/professional nodes in the field of online trust and safety

As new online safety laws and advances in AI reshape digital markets, a new class of third-party software vendors has emerged offering platforms for managing trust and safety. This article examines how these vendors reshape platform governance not merely as secondary labor providers but as positioned actors in a social and professional field. Through interviews, fieldwork at an industry conference, and analysis of vendor texts, this study finds that these start-ups are incentivized to build moderation platforms that capture critical chokepoints between social media platforms, AI model developers, regulators, and moderation labor. From this position, vendors translate legal ambiguity into operational norms and recast moderation as a form of preemptive risk management. These findings reframe platform governance by revealing how a growing intermediary field of trust and safety institutions mediates external pressure on platform companies and shapes standard norms and practices for governance across the field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Platforms & Society
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/29768624251390683
Primary Topic
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Salesforce of safety: Software vendors as infrastructural/professional nodes in the field of online trust and safety

Lucas Wright
Platforms & Society
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
article

The Salesforce of safety: Software vendors as infrastructural/professional nodes in the field of online trust and safety

Lucas Wright
article en

Abstract

As new online safety laws and advances in AI reshape digital markets, a new class of third-party software vendors has emerged offering platforms for managing trust and safety. This article examines how these vendors reshape platform governance not merely as secondary labor providers but as positioned actors in a social and professional field. Through interviews, fieldwork at an industry conference, and analysis of vendor texts, this study finds that these start-ups are incentivized to build moderation platforms that capture critical chokepoints between social media platforms, AI model developers, regulators, and moderation labor. From this position, vendors translate legal ambiguity into operational norms and recast moderation as a form of preemptive risk management. These findings reframe platform governance by revealing how a growing intermediary field of trust and safety institutions mediates external pressure on platform companies and shapes standard norms and practices for governance across the field.

Platforms & SocietyVol. 2
Cornell University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Salesforce of safety: Software vendors as infrastructural/professional nodes in the field of online trust and safety — Lucas Wright · Platforms & Society (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS