Identification of pancreatic subtypes and prognostic markers on the basis of changes in immunologic signature gene sets activity

The heterogeneity of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAAD) tumors is complex. The purpose of this work was to use immunologic signature gene sets (ISGS) activity alterations to identify subtypes of PAAD and to develop valid prognostic indicators. We discovered tumor-related differentially expressed gene sets and their associated subtypes by analyzing changes in ISGS activity via the cancer genome Atlas and the genotype-tissue expression datasets. To evaluate the relationship between these subtypes and clinical characteristics, the immunological microenvironment, and tumor immune dysfunction and exclusion, we conducted survival studies. Furthermore, we identified subtype-specific gene sets and developed a prognostic risk score (RS) model and a corresponding nomogram. The robustness and generalizability of the RS model were validated using the gene expression omnibus dataset. Additionally, differences in drug sensitivity and tumor mutation burden were compared between risk groups. On the basis of variations in ISGS activity, 2 subtypes of PAAD were distinguished. The prognosis is worse for subtype 1 patients, and there is no statistically significant difference between the clinicopathologic characteristics of the 2 subtypes. However, subtype 1 patients do not respond well to immunotherapy, and the immunological microenvironment varies significantly across subtypes. Additionally, patients were assigned to distinct risk groups by a prognostic RS model based on differentially expressed genes linked to both subtypes. Individuals belonging to distinct risk categories exhibited varying degrees of medication sensitivity; high-risk patients also had shorter survival periods and greater tumor mutation burden. For patients with pancreatic cancer, nomograms that include RS and clinicopathologic variables are may provide useful tools. Our research used the ISGS to identify subtypes of PAAD and created prognostic RS models. Through the integration of the RS and clinicopathological parameters into nomograms, prognostic prediction may be reinforced, and may provide new perspectives for future personalized treatment strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000045385
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identification of pancreatic subtypes and prognostic markers on the basis of changes in immunologic signature gene sets activity

Junwei Fang, Meili Lin, Ni Wang, Junhao Du et al.
Medicine
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
article

Identification of pancreatic subtypes and prognostic markers on the basis of changes in immunologic signature gene sets activity

Junwei Fang, Meili Lin, Ni Wang, Junhao Du, Shuang Gao, Meiping Wang, Weibin Lin
article en

Abstract

The heterogeneity of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAAD) tumors is complex. The purpose of this work was to use immunologic signature gene sets (ISGS) activity alterations to identify subtypes of PAAD and to develop valid prognostic indicators. We discovered tumor-related differentially expressed gene sets and their associated subtypes by analyzing changes in ISGS activity via the cancer genome Atlas and the genotype-tissue expression datasets. To evaluate the relationship between these subtypes and clinical characteristics, the immunological microenvironment, and tumor immune dysfunction and exclusion, we conducted survival studies. Furthermore, we identified subtype-specific gene sets and developed a prognostic risk score (RS) model and a corresponding nomogram. The robustness and generalizability of the RS model were validated using the gene expression omnibus dataset. Additionally, differences in drug sensitivity and tumor mutation burden were compared between risk groups. On the basis of variations in ISGS activity, 2 subtypes of PAAD were distinguished. The prognosis is worse for subtype 1 patients, and there is no statistically significant difference between the clinicopathologic characteristics of the 2 subtypes. However, subtype 1 patients do not respond well to immunotherapy, and the immunological microenvironment varies significantly across subtypes. Additionally, patients were assigned to distinct risk groups by a prognostic RS model based on differentially expressed genes linked to both subtypes. Individuals belonging to distinct risk categories exhibited varying degrees of medication sensitivity; high-risk patients also had shorter survival periods and greater tumor mutation burden. For patients with pancreatic cancer, nomograms that include RS and clinicopathologic variables are may provide useful tools. Our research used the ISGS to identify subtypes of PAAD and created prognostic RS models. Through the integration of the RS and clinicopathological parameters into nomograms, prognostic prediction may be reinforced, and may provide new perspectives for future personalized treatment strategies.

MedicineVol. 104(44)
Fujian Medical University (CN), Xiamen University (CN), Fuzhou General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.