Evaluation of the use of the central physician appointment system and patient satisfaction in a training and research hospital: A cross-sectional study

This study aimed to determine the usage status of the central physician appointment system (CPAS) by patients visiting the outpatient clinic of a tertiary hospital and their level of satisfaction with the healthcare services they receive. The sample of this study consisted of 291 patients who received outpatient services at a tertiary healthcare institution in Malatya. The data collection form consisted of 2 sections. The data collection form consisted of 2 parts. The first section included sociodemographic information, and the second section included the Outpatient Satisfaction Scale. In the present study, 291 people participated, of whom 52.9% (n = 154) were female. The findings showed that 17.5% (n = 51) of the study group had no information about the appointment system. Those who had not yet made an appointment with CPAS (by themselves or anyone else) constituted 23.4% (n = 68) of the sample. In addition, 63.2% (n = 141) of those who had made an appointment at least once before this study had made their appointments online (CPAS). The average Outpatient Satisfaction Scale score of the group was 3.40. Gender and income affected patient satisfaction, but there was no significant correlation with other demographic variables. It was determined that the most satisfied issue was Effective Inspection. The least satisfied issue was the Waiting Time and Consultancy dimension.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000045507
Primary Topic
Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the use of the central physician appointment system and patient satisfaction in a training and research hospital: A cross-sectional study

Serdar Deniz, Feyza İnceoğlu, Mehmet Koca
Medicine
Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
article

Evaluation of the use of the central physician appointment system and patient satisfaction in a training and research hospital: A cross-sectional study

Serdar Deniz, Feyza İnceoğlu, Mehmet Koca
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the usage status of the central physician appointment system (CPAS) by patients visiting the outpatient clinic of a tertiary hospital and their level of satisfaction with the healthcare services they receive. The sample of this study consisted of 291 patients who received outpatient services at a tertiary healthcare institution in Malatya. The data collection form consisted of 2 sections. The data collection form consisted of 2 parts. The first section included sociodemographic information, and the second section included the Outpatient Satisfaction Scale. In the present study, 291 people participated, of whom 52.9% (n = 154) were female. The findings showed that 17.5% (n = 51) of the study group had no information about the appointment system. Those who had not yet made an appointment with CPAS (by themselves or anyone else) constituted 23.4% (n = 68) of the sample. In addition, 63.2% (n = 141) of those who had made an appointment at least once before this study had made their appointments online (CPAS). The average Outpatient Satisfaction Scale score of the group was 3.40. Gender and income affected patient satisfaction, but there was no significant correlation with other demographic variables. It was determined that the most satisfied issue was Effective Inspection. The least satisfied issue was the Waiting Time and Consultancy dimension.

MedicineVol. 104(44)
Malatya Turgut Özal Üniversitesi (TR), Turgut Özal Tıp Merkezi (TR), Turgut Özal University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.