What was (and is) the Point of Macaronics? Historical and Typological Considerations

A historically significant form of linguistic hybridization was the so-called ‘macaronic’ poetry from the Italian Renaissance. Its best-known practitioner was a sixteenth-century Benedictine monk, Teofilo Folengo. Starting from that historical context, this article seeks to better describe what was (and remains) typical of macaronic writing, namely the intentional creation of a linguistic hybrid with comic effect. In macaronic multilingualism, languages are blended, fused together, not juxtaposed, as happens in other manifestations of multilingualism in literature. A more difficult question relates to the need (or not) for Latin to be part of the equation. In the absence of bilingual blending, the mere presence of Latin is certainly not enough, but what about clearly hybrid texts that only involve modern languages and do not contain any Latin?

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Comparative Critical Studies
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3366/ccs.2025.0571
Primary Topic
Historical Linguistics and Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What was (and is) the Point of Macaronics? Historical and Typological Considerations

Rainier Grutman
Comparative Critical Studies
Historical Linguistics and Language Studies
article

What was (and is) the Point of Macaronics? Historical and Typological Considerations

Rainier Grutman
article en

Abstract

A historically significant form of linguistic hybridization was the so-called ‘macaronic’ poetry from the Italian Renaissance. Its best-known practitioner was a sixteenth-century Benedictine monk, Teofilo Folengo. Starting from that historical context, this article seeks to better describe what was (and remains) typical of macaronic writing, namely the intentional creation of a linguistic hybrid with comic effect. In macaronic multilingualism, languages are blended, fused together, not juxtaposed, as happens in other manifestations of multilingualism in literature. A more difficult question relates to the need (or not) for Latin to be part of the equation. In the absence of bilingual blending, the mere presence of Latin is certainly not enough, but what about clearly hybrid texts that only involve modern languages and do not contain any Latin?

Comparative Critical StudiesVol. 22(3)
University of Ottawa (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Historical Linguistics and Language Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.