A Comparative CFD–PIV Analysis of a Stirred Tank Equipped with a Rushton and a Pitched Blade Turbine

Abstract This study presents the hydrodynamic behavior of a dual‐stage stirred tank, which is typically used in bioprocesses and is equipped with a Rushton turbine (RT) below and a pitched blade turbine (PBT) above. The investigation of the turbulent flow is based on numerical simulations (computational fluid dynamics, CFD) and experiments (particle image velocimetry, 2D–2C PIV). Direct CFD–PIV comparisons in dual‐impeller tanks are rare. The velocity and turbulent kinetic energy vertical profiles show a high degree of agreement between the CFD and PIV data across the entire tank at 250 rpm. The power consumption calculated by CFD for the RT accounts for 78 % of the global power number. CFD post‐processing confirms the presence of a pair of trailing vortices behind the RT only, with local velocities exceeding the tip speed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chemical Engineering & Technology
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.70130
Primary Topic
Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative CFD–PIV Analysis of a Stirred Tank Equipped with a Rushton and a Pitched Blade Turbine

Ahmed Frikha, Jérôme Morchain, Arnaud Cockx, Sobhi Frikha et al.
Chemical Engineering & Technology
Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
article

A Comparative CFD–PIV Analysis of a Stirred Tank Equipped with a Rushton and a Pitched Blade Turbine

Ahmed Frikha, Jérôme Morchain, Arnaud Cockx, Sobhi Frikha, Alain Liné, Ali Ben Kilani
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study presents the hydrodynamic behavior of a dual‐stage stirred tank, which is typically used in bioprocesses and is equipped with a Rushton turbine (RT) below and a pitched blade turbine (PBT) above. The investigation of the turbulent flow is based on numerical simulations (computational fluid dynamics, CFD) and experiments (particle image velocimetry, 2D–2C PIV). Direct CFD–PIV comparisons in dual‐impeller tanks are rare. The velocity and turbulent kinetic energy vertical profiles show a high degree of agreement between the CFD and PIV data across the entire tank at 250 rpm. The power consumption calculated by CFD for the RT accounts for 78 % of the global power number. CFD post‐processing confirms the presence of a pair of trailing vortices behind the RT only, with local velocities exceeding the tip speed.

Chemical Engineering & TechnologyVol. 48(11)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), University of Sfax (TN), Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Toulouse (FR), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR)
Indian National Science Academy, Campus France
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.