Who Wins? Professional Identity and the American Association for the History of Medicine's Early Career Scholar Awards

The American Association for the History of Medicine endeavors to represent the entire field and all those interested in the subject. Over time, its core membership has shifted from mostly amateur clinician historians to professionals with a PhD, resulting in a corresponding change in content and culture. In an effort to foster interest among both younger clinicians and historians, the organization sponsors multiple essay contests. Tracking the number of winners who ultimately publish their essays, where such publications reside, from which institutions they herald, and how long they remain members reveals that medical students are by far the least likely to publish and almost never retain their membership. Graduate students in history and early career scholars are far more likely to publish their work and remain a part of the organization. This paper proposes several strategies to try to recruit and retain more amateur clinician-historians.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences
Published
2025-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jhmas/jraf018
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Empathy and Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.47
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who Wins? Professional Identity and the American Association for the History of Medicine's Early Career Scholar Awards

Justin Barr, Deborah B. Doroshow, Kristen Ann Ehrenberger, Todd M. Olszewski
1 citations
Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences
Empathy and Medical Education
1.47
article

Who Wins? Professional Identity and the American Association for the History of Medicine's Early Career Scholar Awards

Justin Barr, Deborah B. Doroshow, Kristen Ann Ehrenberger, Todd M. Olszewski
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The American Association for the History of Medicine endeavors to represent the entire field and all those interested in the subject. Over time, its core membership has shifted from mostly amateur clinician historians to professionals with a PhD, resulting in a corresponding change in content and culture. In an effort to foster interest among both younger clinicians and historians, the organization sponsors multiple essay contests. Tracking the number of winners who ultimately publish their essays, where such publications reside, from which institutions they herald, and how long they remain members reveals that medical students are by far the least likely to publish and almost never retain their membership. Graduate students in history and early career scholars are far more likely to publish their work and remain a part of the organization. This paper proposes several strategies to try to recruit and retain more amateur clinician-historians.

Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied SciencesVol. 81(1)
University of Pittsburgh (US), Providence College (US), Ochsner Medical Center (US), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Empathy and Medical Education
1.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.