Histopathological Scoring Improves the Correlation Between Capsular Contracture Diagnosis and Patient-Reported Outcomes

Abstract Background The Baker classification is used to grade capsular contracture after breast-implant surgery; yet, its correlation with patient-reported outcomes is poor. Objectives To determine whether histopathological verification of capsular contracture status strengthens the association between Baker grade and BREAST-Q scores. Methods Women scheduled for implant exchange or removal completed the BREAST-Q “Physical Well-Being-Chest” module. Raw BREAST-Q sum scores were transformed to a 0-100 scale, where higher scores indicate increased comfort. The attending surgeon classified breasts using the Baker scale (I-IV). Capsule biopsies were scored with a validated histopathological scoring system. Baker grades were deemed “confirmed” when histology and Baker grade were aligned and otherwise deemed “misclassified”. Linear regressions compared the relationship between BREAST-Q scores and Baker grade in confirmed vs misclassified cases. Results A total of 103 patients (58 augmentation, 45 reconstruction) were included. The Baker classification was confirmed histologically in 53/58 augmentation patients (91%), and 36/45 reconstruction patients (80%). In confirmed augmentation cases, each one-grade increase in Baker significantly worsened chest well-being by −8.80 BREAST-Q points (95% CI [−14.42, −3.18]; P = .003). No correlation was found in the misclassified augmentation cases (−3.21 points; P = .57), confirmed reconstruction cases (−5.00 points; P = .19), or in the misclassified reconstruction cases (−5.72 points; P = .54). Conclusions Histologically confirmed Baker classification correlates significantly with chest well-being assessed with BREAST-Q for the patients with breast augmentation, whereas no such correlation was observed in cases where the histology and Baker classification showed a mismatch. This suggests that histopathological scoring can increase diagnostic accuracy when assessing capsular contracture status. Level of Evidence: 3 (Therapeutic)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aesthetic Surgery Journal
Published
2025-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaf241
Primary Topic
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Histopathological Scoring Improves the Correlation Between Capsular Contracture Diagnosis and Patient-Reported Outcomes

Mathilde N. Hemmingsen, Jesper Trillingsgaard, Mathias Ørholt, Mikkel Herly et al.
Aesthetic Surgery Journal
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
article

Histopathological Scoring Improves the Correlation Between Capsular Contracture Diagnosis and Patient-Reported Outcomes

Mathilde N. Hemmingsen, Jesper Trillingsgaard, Mathias Ørholt, Mikkel Herly, Mads Gustaf Jørgensen, Erik Eiler Frydshou Bak, Nicco Krezdorn, Andreas Larsen, Peter Vester‐Glowinski, Tim K. Weltz, Lisbet Rosenkrantz Hölmich, Jens Jørgen Elberg, Linda Regina Gudjonsdottir, Maria O Snog
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The Baker classification is used to grade capsular contracture after breast-implant surgery; yet, its correlation with patient-reported outcomes is poor. Objectives To determine whether histopathological verification of capsular contracture status strengthens the association between Baker grade and BREAST-Q scores. Methods Women scheduled for implant exchange or removal completed the BREAST-Q “Physical Well-Being-Chest” module. Raw BREAST-Q sum scores were transformed to a 0-100 scale, where higher scores indicate increased comfort. The attending surgeon classified breasts using the Baker scale (I-IV). Capsule biopsies were scored with a validated histopathological scoring system. Baker grades were deemed “confirmed” when histology and Baker grade were aligned and otherwise deemed “misclassified”. Linear regressions compared the relationship between BREAST-Q scores and Baker grade in confirmed vs misclassified cases. Results A total of 103 patients (58 augmentation, 45 reconstruction) were included. The Baker classification was confirmed histologically in 53/58 augmentation patients (91%), and 36/45 reconstruction patients (80%). In confirmed augmentation cases, each one-grade increase in Baker significantly worsened chest well-being by −8.80 BREAST-Q points (95% CI [−14.42, −3.18]; P = .003). No correlation was found in the misclassified augmentation cases (−3.21 points; P = .57), confirmed reconstruction cases (−5.00 points; P = .19), or in the misclassified reconstruction cases (−5.72 points; P = .54). Conclusions Histologically confirmed Baker classification correlates significantly with chest well-being assessed with BREAST-Q for the patients with breast augmentation, whereas no such correlation was observed in cases where the histology and Baker classification showed a mismatch. This suggests that histopathological scoring can increase diagnostic accuracy when assessing capsular contracture status. Level of Evidence: 3 (Therapeutic)

Aesthetic Surgery JournalVol. 46(3)
American Society of Plastic Surgeons (US), Copenhagen University Hospital (DK), Gentofte Hospital (DK), Rigshospitalet (DK), Zealand University Hospital (DK), Meridian Plastic Surgeons (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.