Estimands: what they are and why we should use them

In clinical trials, postrandomization events, such as treatment discontinuation or the use of rescue medication, can complicate the interpretation of results. An estimand is a precise description of the treatment effect that investigators wish to estimate. Estimands facilitate more straightforward interpretation of trial results by explicitly defining how postrandomization "intercurrent" events are incorporated into the research question. This article introduces the five key attributes of estimands (population, treatment conditions, endpoint, summary measure, and strategies for intercurrent events) and explains the five main strategies for managing intercurrent events (treatment policy, composite, while on treatment, hypothetical, and principal stratum). Using a practical example of a trial comparing cognitive behavioral therapy vs medication for mild anxiety, we demonstrate how different estimand choices lead to varying study designs, analyses, and interpretations. Understanding estimands helps researchers design better trials and enables stakeholders to determine if the results are relevant to their situation. We also explain how sensitivity analyses can be used to check the reliability of results by assessing how results change under different statistical assumptions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.112054
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.89
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimands: what they are and why we should use them

Brennan C Kahan, Declan Devane
3 citations
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
7.89
article

Estimands: what they are and why we should use them

Brennan C Kahan, Declan Devane
article en
3 citations

Abstract

In clinical trials, postrandomization events, such as treatment discontinuation or the use of rescue medication, can complicate the interpretation of results. An estimand is a precise description of the treatment effect that investigators wish to estimate. Estimands facilitate more straightforward interpretation of trial results by explicitly defining how postrandomization "intercurrent" events are incorporated into the research question. This article introduces the five key attributes of estimands (population, treatment conditions, endpoint, summary measure, and strategies for intercurrent events) and explains the five main strategies for managing intercurrent events (treatment policy, composite, while on treatment, hypothetical, and principal stratum). Using a practical example of a trial comparing cognitive behavioral therapy vs medication for mild anxiety, we demonstrate how different estimand choices lead to varying study designs, analyses, and interpretations. Understanding estimands helps researchers design better trials and enables stakeholders to determine if the results are relevant to their situation. We also explain how sensitivity analyses can be used to check the reliability of results by assessing how results change under different statistical assumptions.

Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyVol. 189
MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL (GB), Trials Methodology Research Network (IE), University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
7.89
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.