Comparison between Face-to-Face and Telephone DASH Interviews in Hand Patients

Background. The Filipino version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (FIL-DASH) is a patient-reported outcome measure validated for assessment during a face-to-face consult. When in-person consults are not feasible, such as during periods of lockdown or geographical limitations, patient outcomes should still be measured accurately.Objective. To compare the Filipino Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (FIL-DASH) scores of patients with hand disorders during face-to-face and telephone interviews.Methodology. This was a pilot prospective comparative study. Patients aged 18 to 60 years with various chronic hand and upper extremity conditions seen at the Hand and Microvascular Surgery outpatient department of the Philippine General Hospital had face-to-face FIL-DASH interviews conducted by a trained interviewer. The same interviewer conducted a telephone FIL-DASH interview on these same patients after seven days. Survey information was collected and encoded using an electronic spreadsheet file. Descriptive statistics such as mean, median, frequency, and percentage were used to describe the clinical characteristics of the study participants. A paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the mean FIL-DASH scores between face-to-face and telephone modes. The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) was used to determine the relationship of the FIL-DASH scores obtained from face-to-face and telephone interviews.Result. There were 79 respondents included in the study. The FIL-DASH scores from telephone interviews were significantly lower than the scores from face-to-face consults. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was estimated to be 0.96, with a range of 0.94–0.98 (p <0.01). This showed a strong, positive relationship between FIL-DASH measured in both modes with a high correlation coefficient.Conclusion. Despite FIL-dash scores from telephone interviews being lower, the study showed a strong correlationbetween the face-to-face and telephone FIL-DASH scores. This supports the use of the assessment of the FIL-DASHvia telephone interview.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philippine journal of orthopaedics.
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69472/poai.2025.26
Primary Topic
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison between Face-to-Face and Telephone DASH Interviews in Hand Patients

Jose Ma. D. Bautista, Evrim Tan
Philippine journal of orthopaedics.
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
article

Comparison between Face-to-Face and Telephone DASH Interviews in Hand Patients

Jose Ma. D. Bautista, Evrim Tan
article en

Abstract

Background. The Filipino version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (FIL-DASH) is a patient-reported outcome measure validated for assessment during a face-to-face consult. When in-person consults are not feasible, such as during periods of lockdown or geographical limitations, patient outcomes should still be measured accurately.Objective. To compare the Filipino Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (FIL-DASH) scores of patients with hand disorders during face-to-face and telephone interviews.Methodology. This was a pilot prospective comparative study. Patients aged 18 to 60 years with various chronic hand and upper extremity conditions seen at the Hand and Microvascular Surgery outpatient department of the Philippine General Hospital had face-to-face FIL-DASH interviews conducted by a trained interviewer. The same interviewer conducted a telephone FIL-DASH interview on these same patients after seven days. Survey information was collected and encoded using an electronic spreadsheet file. Descriptive statistics such as mean, median, frequency, and percentage were used to describe the clinical characteristics of the study participants. A paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the mean FIL-DASH scores between face-to-face and telephone modes. The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) was used to determine the relationship of the FIL-DASH scores obtained from face-to-face and telephone interviews.Result. There were 79 respondents included in the study. The FIL-DASH scores from telephone interviews were significantly lower than the scores from face-to-face consults. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was estimated to be 0.96, with a range of 0.94–0.98 (p <0.01). This showed a strong, positive relationship between FIL-DASH measured in both modes with a high correlation coefficient.Conclusion. Despite FIL-dash scores from telephone interviews being lower, the study showed a strong correlationbetween the face-to-face and telephone FIL-DASH scores. This supports the use of the assessment of the FIL-DASHvia telephone interview.

Philippine journal of orthopaedics.Vol. 40(3)
University of the Philippines Manila (PH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.