Towards an attitude of responsibility for safety in life science education

The rapid pace of innovation in the life sciences raises new questions about the safety and security of emerging technologies and processes. Therefore, it is important to investigate what is taught about safety and how it is taught during the early stages of scientific training in higher education. In this study, we conducted a gap analysis based on an inventory of learning content covering different dimensions and elements of safety, including understanding and reasoning related to the Safe-by-Design concept. Each topic was evaluated using two three-level scales: one describing how frequently it appeared in the curriculum and another reflecting the depth of learning, from cognitive knowledge to skill and attitude development. Using Wageningen University as a case study, we conducted a series of qualitative interviews with programme directors and lecturers from various life science divisions. Our results show that the technical aspects of safety received the most attention, particularly when teaching about the development phase of innovations. At the same time, skills related to anticipating and managing risks and other responsibility-related elements needed to be strengthened in the curricula. Notably, the frequency with which a safety element is taught was always higher than the extent to which the corresponding skills were developed. This highlights the need to equip students with the skills needed to improve their own judgment of safety in their future careers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity
Published
2025-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobb.2025.10.002
Primary Topic
Chemical Safety and Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards an attitude of responsibility for safety in life science education

Zoë Robaey, Vítor A. P. Martins dos Santos, Enrique Asin‐Garcia, Hetty Huijs
Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity
Chemical Safety and Risk Management
article

Towards an attitude of responsibility for safety in life science education

Zoë Robaey, Vítor A. P. Martins dos Santos, Enrique Asin‐Garcia, Hetty Huijs
article en

Abstract

The rapid pace of innovation in the life sciences raises new questions about the safety and security of emerging technologies and processes. Therefore, it is important to investigate what is taught about safety and how it is taught during the early stages of scientific training in higher education. In this study, we conducted a gap analysis based on an inventory of learning content covering different dimensions and elements of safety, including understanding and reasoning related to the Safe-by-Design concept. Each topic was evaluated using two three-level scales: one describing how frequently it appeared in the curriculum and another reflecting the depth of learning, from cognitive knowledge to skill and attitude development. Using Wageningen University as a case study, we conducted a series of qualitative interviews with programme directors and lecturers from various life science divisions. Our results show that the technical aspects of safety received the most attention, particularly when teaching about the development phase of innovations. At the same time, skills related to anticipating and managing risks and other responsibility-related elements needed to be strengthened in the curricula. Notably, the frequency with which a safety element is taught was always higher than the extent to which the corresponding skills were developed. This highlights the need to equip students with the skills needed to improve their own judgment of safety in their future careers.

Journal of Biosafety and BiosecurityVol. 7(4)
LifeGlimmer (Germany) (DE), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Chemical Safety and Risk Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.