Mundification: Arguments for a New Idealism

Abstract Today, there is a tendency within the field of environmental education to argue that the current global metacrisis is intrinsically linked to idealist traditions in philosophy and culture. The underlying intuition appears to be that idealism ultimately relies on a Cartesian distinction between mind and body: that it privileges the mind while neglecting the body, thereby enabling a view of materiality – or “nature” – as something to be used or exploited. A similar assumption can be identified in the call for papers for this issue, where modern idealism is linked to neoliberal politics and economics. In contrast, the aim of our paper is not to reject idealism entirely but to argue that the real issue lies in particular ideas and worldviews associated with specific understandings of reality. To open up space for alternative ideas and imaginaries, we propose that educational theory and practice must engage with a process we term mundification : the initiation of individuals – though education and other cultural practices – into what it means for there to be something at all, that is; a world.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal of Environmental Education
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2025.10090
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mundification: Arguments for a New Idealism

Michael Paulsen, Morten Ziethen
1 citations
Australian Journal of Environmental Education
Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
16.49
article

Mundification: Arguments for a New Idealism

Michael Paulsen, Morten Ziethen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Today, there is a tendency within the field of environmental education to argue that the current global metacrisis is intrinsically linked to idealist traditions in philosophy and culture. The underlying intuition appears to be that idealism ultimately relies on a Cartesian distinction between mind and body: that it privileges the mind while neglecting the body, thereby enabling a view of materiality – or “nature” – as something to be used or exploited. A similar assumption can be identified in the call for papers for this issue, where modern idealism is linked to neoliberal politics and economics. In contrast, the aim of our paper is not to reject idealism entirely but to argue that the real issue lies in particular ideas and worldviews associated with specific understandings of reality. To open up space for alternative ideas and imaginaries, we propose that educational theory and practice must engage with a process we term mundification : the initiation of individuals – though education and other cultural practices – into what it means for there to be something at all, that is; a world.

Australian Journal of Environmental EducationVol. 41(5)
University of Southern Denmark (DK), Aalborg University (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
16.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.