The Effects of Reading and Discussion Class on Undergraduates’ Self-regulated Learning

This paper is to analyze the effects of reading and discussion class on undergraduates’ self-regulated learning. Data were collected from a total of 32 undergraduates completing pre- and post-surveys, which were the modified version of Pintrich & DeGroot’s(1990) MSLQ (Motivated Strategies Learning Questionnaire). It consists of 5 questions of critical thinking, 14 questions of meta-cognitive, and 5 questions of self-efficacy. In addition, the in-depth interviews in person were carried out with ten students who agreed it. A paired t-test was used for data analysis. The findings are summarized as follows: 1) The means of critical thinking and meta-cognitive showed the statistically meaningful difference from paired t-test of pre- and post-surveys. 2) The means of self-efficacy also showed the significant difference from the paired t-test of pre- and post-surveys. In addition, most of the interviewees realized that reading and discussion class enabled them to enhance thinking skills and learning course design skills, and make good relationships among peers. Consequently, it is Reading and Discussion that can enhance learners’ self-regulated learning.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in Linguistics
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17002/sil..77.202510.373
Primary Topic
Education and Learning Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effects of Reading and Discussion Class on Undergraduates’ Self-regulated Learning

Chankyu Park
Studies in Linguistics
Education and Learning Interventions
article

The Effects of Reading and Discussion Class on Undergraduates’ Self-regulated Learning

Chankyu Park
article en

Abstract

This paper is to analyze the effects of reading and discussion class on undergraduates’ self-regulated learning. Data were collected from a total of 32 undergraduates completing pre- and post-surveys, which were the modified version of Pintrich & DeGroot’s(1990) MSLQ (Motivated Strategies Learning Questionnaire). It consists of 5 questions of critical thinking, 14 questions of meta-cognitive, and 5 questions of self-efficacy. In addition, the in-depth interviews in person were carried out with ten students who agreed it. A paired t-test was used for data analysis. The findings are summarized as follows: 1) The means of critical thinking and meta-cognitive showed the statistically meaningful difference from paired t-test of pre- and post-surveys. 2) The means of self-efficacy also showed the significant difference from the paired t-test of pre- and post-surveys. In addition, most of the interviewees realized that reading and discussion class enabled them to enhance thinking skills and learning course design skills, and make good relationships among peers. Consequently, it is Reading and Discussion that can enhance learners’ self-regulated learning.

Studies in LinguisticsVol. 77
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Education and Learning Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.