Scaffolding with Generative AI in Language Classrooms: A Critical Thinking Framework

This paper proposes a critical thinking framework for integrating generative AI into English language instruction. Drawing on the tradition of Socratic dialogue, Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) and collaborative learning, this paper argues that AI should function not as a substitute for instruction but as a scaffold supporting learner autonomy and reflective language growth. The study outlines three applications: AI-assisted scaffolding for ZPD-based writing improvement, collaborative prompting tasks grounded in the CoPIR model, and task designs fostering structural awareness and critical revision. Examples show how instructors can adjust feedback and prompt engagement through both peer and AI mediation. Rather than relying on AI for content creation, students are guided to revise, evaluate, and expand AI output, enhancing linguistic accuracy and self-monitoring. The framework positions AI as a tool for peer interaction and critical language use in the classroom, encouraging learners to think independently while engaging critically with AI-generated language.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in Linguistics
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17002/sil..77.202510.349
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scaffolding with Generative AI in Language Classrooms: A Critical Thinking Framework

Seulkee Park, Okgi Kim
Studies in Linguistics
AI in Service Interactions
article

Scaffolding with Generative AI in Language Classrooms: A Critical Thinking Framework

Seulkee Park, Okgi Kim
article en

Abstract

This paper proposes a critical thinking framework for integrating generative AI into English language instruction. Drawing on the tradition of Socratic dialogue, Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) and collaborative learning, this paper argues that AI should function not as a substitute for instruction but as a scaffold supporting learner autonomy and reflective language growth. The study outlines three applications: AI-assisted scaffolding for ZPD-based writing improvement, collaborative prompting tasks grounded in the CoPIR model, and task designs fostering structural awareness and critical revision. Examples show how instructors can adjust feedback and prompt engagement through both peer and AI mediation. Rather than relying on AI for content creation, students are guided to revise, evaluate, and expand AI output, enhancing linguistic accuracy and self-monitoring. The framework positions AI as a tool for peer interaction and critical language use in the classroom, encouraging learners to think independently while engaging critically with AI-generated language.

Studies in LinguisticsVol. 77
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Scaffolding with Generative AI in Language Classrooms: A Critical Thinking Framework — Seulkee Park, Okgi Kim · Studies in Linguistics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS