Examining the impact and motivations of play in academic libraries: A cross-sectional study
Introduction: Academic libraries are well situated to provide students with opportunities to de-stress through play. However, the impacts of play and student motivations to participate have not been formally investigated. This study aimed to answer the questions: What are the impacts of play in academic libraries? And why do students choose to participate in play events in these settings? Methods: A cross-sectional study design was used. Recruitment took place at three academic libraries in Canada. Participants were University students actively engaging in a play event. An eight-item questionnaire was distributed. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. Results: 93 participants completed the study. The majority were undergraduate, domestic students residing off-campus. The impact of personal enjoyment had the highest mean response among the impacts measured. The top motivations for participating were to take a break, to engage in the activity being offered, and for enjoyment or fun. Discussion: Participants were motivated and impacted by personal enjoyment, aligning with previous research on play in adulthood. However, the need to take a break was the strongest motivator to participate in play events for this post-secondary student population. Academic libraries are an optimal place on campus for play events to occur.
Authors
- Glyneva Bradley-Ridout (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2879-9056)
- Mikaela Gray (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5580-5824)
- Kaitlin Fuller (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8315-187X)
- Angélique Roy (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6527-6110)
- Maggie Gordon
- Grace Bourret
Institutions
- University of Toronto (CA)
- St. Francis Xavier University (CA)
- Queen's University (CA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- The Journal of Play in Adulthood
- Published
- 2025-11-14
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.5920/jpa.1692
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Library Science and Information Literacy
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 11.53