Normative Ranges for Auditory Brainstem Response Wave I Amplitude: A Potential Diagnostic Indicator of Cochlear Deafferentation

PURPOSE: While cochlear synaptopathy has limited impact on auditory thresholds, there is increasing evidence that cochlear deafferentation is associated with auditory perceptual deficits. However, there is currently no means for diagnosing synaptopathy or deafferentation in individual patients. The objectives of this study were to establish normative ranges for auditory brainstem response (ABR) Wave I amplitude, a measure sensitive to synaptopathy in animals, in a population at low risk for cochlear deafferentation and then compare a population at high risk for deafferentation to the normative ranges. METHOD: The low-risk sample consisted of 169 non-Veteran young adults with normal audiograms, minimal self-reported noise exposure history, and no auditory complaints (tinnitus, decreased sound tolerance, or speech perception in noise difficulty). ABR Wave I amplitude normative ranges were generated for 2, 4, and 8 kHz tonebursts and were statistically adjusted for sex and average distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) levels. Ninety-one military Veterans with normal audiograms and at least one auditory complaint were included in the high-risk comparison sample. RESULTS: While the DPOAE-adjusted ABR normative ranges were effective at distinguishing between the low- and high-risk samples, the results also indicated that adjusting the ABR normative ranges for outer hair cell dysfunction may not be necessary and could be problematic. ABR normative ranges that were adjusted only for sex were able to differentiate between the low- and high-risk samples, with 51% of the high-risk sample falling below the normative ranges for a 105 dB peak equivalent sound pressure level 8-kHz toneburst. CONCLUSION: In patients with normal audiograms, sex-specific ABR Wave I amplitude normative ranges can be used by clinicians to identify patients with high degrees of cochlear deafferentation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Audiology
Published
2026-08-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1044/2026_aja-25-00296
Primary Topic
Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Normative Ranges for Auditory Brainstem Response Wave I Amplitude: A Potential Diagnostic Indicator of Cochlear Deafferentation

Naomi F. Bramhall, Garnett P. McMillan, Sean D. Kampel, Nicole Whittle et al.
American Journal of Audiology
Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
article

Normative Ranges for Auditory Brainstem Response Wave I Amplitude: A Potential Diagnostic Indicator of Cochlear Deafferentation

Naomi F. Bramhall, Garnett P. McMillan, Sean D. Kampel, Nicole Whittle, Anne E Heassler, Haley A. Szabo
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: While cochlear synaptopathy has limited impact on auditory thresholds, there is increasing evidence that cochlear deafferentation is associated with auditory perceptual deficits. However, there is currently no means for diagnosing synaptopathy or deafferentation in individual patients. The objectives of this study were to establish normative ranges for auditory brainstem response (ABR) Wave I amplitude, a measure sensitive to synaptopathy in animals, in a population at low risk for cochlear deafferentation and then compare a population at high risk for deafferentation to the normative ranges. METHOD: The low-risk sample consisted of 169 non-Veteran young adults with normal audiograms, minimal self-reported noise exposure history, and no auditory complaints (tinnitus, decreased sound tolerance, or speech perception in noise difficulty). ABR Wave I amplitude normative ranges were generated for 2, 4, and 8 kHz tonebursts and were statistically adjusted for sex and average distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) levels. Ninety-one military Veterans with normal audiograms and at least one auditory complaint were included in the high-risk comparison sample. RESULTS: While the DPOAE-adjusted ABR normative ranges were effective at distinguishing between the low- and high-risk samples, the results also indicated that adjusting the ABR normative ranges for outer hair cell dysfunction may not be necessary and could be problematic. ABR normative ranges that were adjusted only for sex were able to differentiate between the low- and high-risk samples, with 51% of the high-risk sample falling below the normative ranges for a 105 dB peak equivalent sound pressure level 8-kHz toneburst. CONCLUSION: In patients with normal audiograms, sex-specific ABR Wave I amplitude normative ranges can be used by clinicians to identify patients with high degrees of cochlear deafferentation.

American Journal of Audiology
Oregon Health & Science University (US), National Rehabilitation Center (KR), VA Portland Health Care System (US)
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Rehabilitation Research and Development Service
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.