‘A Hard Story to Tell’: Creative Dismantling and (Re)making Post-Nuclear Worlds Through Collage

How can futures without nuclear weapons be imagined from within International Relations (IR)? This article details a speculative future-making exercise that applied the collage method in the IR classroom to gain insight into how participants think about nuclear weapons futures and the obstacles encountered to conceiving of futures without nuclear weapons. It finds that two broad thought structures are at work to condition the boundaries of imagination: ‘nuclear exceptionalism’, which works to constrain imaginary processes, and ‘nuclear ambivalence’, which permits the imagination of a wider range of futures. This article makes two core contributions. The first is pedagogical, demonstrating how collaging can facilitate critical reflection on the boundaries of imagination regarding nuclear weapons. The second is conceptual, illustrating the development and practical application of the ‘worldmaking’ concept in IR, widening its analytical potential and showing researchers and practitioners a creative method of advancing an anti-nuclear politics of the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Millennium Journal of International Studies
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298251380200
Primary Topic
Nuclear Issues and Defense
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘A Hard Story to Tell’: Creative Dismantling and (Re)making Post-Nuclear Worlds Through Collage

Tom Vaughan
Millennium Journal of International Studies
Nuclear Issues and Defense
article

‘A Hard Story to Tell’: Creative Dismantling and (Re)making Post-Nuclear Worlds Through Collage

Tom Vaughan
article en

Abstract

How can futures without nuclear weapons be imagined from within International Relations (IR)? This article details a speculative future-making exercise that applied the collage method in the IR classroom to gain insight into how participants think about nuclear weapons futures and the obstacles encountered to conceiving of futures without nuclear weapons. It finds that two broad thought structures are at work to condition the boundaries of imagination: ‘nuclear exceptionalism’, which works to constrain imaginary processes, and ‘nuclear ambivalence’, which permits the imagination of a wider range of futures. This article makes two core contributions. The first is pedagogical, demonstrating how collaging can facilitate critical reflection on the boundaries of imagination regarding nuclear weapons. The second is conceptual, illustrating the development and practical application of the ‘worldmaking’ concept in IR, widening its analytical potential and showing researchers and practitioners a creative method of advancing an anti-nuclear politics of the future.

Millennium Journal of International StudiesVol. 54(1)
University of Leeds (GB), Institut d'Etudes Politiques de Paris (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Nuclear Issues and Defense
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

‘A Hard Story to Tell’: Creative Dismantling and (Re)making Post-Nuclear Worlds Through Collage — Tom Vaughan · Millennium Journal of International Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS